Why do Majorana particles occur?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Positralino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Majorana Particles
Positralino
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why do Majorana particles occur?
For example, why is the antiparticle of photon itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They don't. The photon is its own antiparticle but is not a Majorana particle. A Majorana particle is a hypothesized type of fermion that is its own antiparticle. There are no Majorana particles known.
 
A Majorana particle is a hypothesized type of fermion that is its own antiparticle. There are no Majorana particles known.

I think that's an overstatement. There are no particles we KNOW FOR SURE are majorana. However, we suspect neutrinos might be. The neutrinoless-double-beta-decay experiments will have to decide the question.
 
My understanding is that none of the known neutrinos can be Majorana. Only an as yet undiscovered sterile neutrino might have a Majorana mass, since all of its quantum numbers are zero. Isn't that right?
 
Bill_K said:
My understanding is that none of the known neutrinos can be Majorana. Only an as yet undiscovered sterile neutrino might have a Majorana mass, since all of its quantum numbers are zero. Isn't that right?

No. The physical neutrinos may, in fact, be Majorana particles. Certainly, the neutrino states that appear in the SM before EW symmetry breaking can't be Majorana, as they carry both SU(2)_L and U(1)_Y charges. However, after EWSB, those charges are no longer conserved and the neutrinos don't carry those that are. So, there's nothing to stop the physical neutrinos from being Majorana particles. It simply becomes a matter of whether the neutrino mass-generating mechanism allows it or not.
 
Bill_K said:
My understanding is that none of the known neutrinos can be Majorana. Only an as yet undiscovered sterile neutrino might have a Majorana mass, since all of its quantum numbers are zero. Isn't that right?

The known neutrinos don't carry any unbroken charges. The typical neutrino mass parameters added to the lagrangian are majorana. If there are no right-handed neutrinos, you have to have a majorana mass.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top