Simulating Gantry Crane in ANSYS: A Student's Query

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zablorg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Crane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simulating a gantry crane in ANSYS, where the user is facing issues with under-constrained elements when attempting to simulate multiple line bodies with different cross-sections. The user has successfully simulated the structure as a single line body but encounters errors when using multiple bodies, indicating a potential connection issue between the elements. Suggestions include exploring contact problems as a possible solution to the simulation failure. The user seeks guidance on standard methods to create a rigid structure from independent line bodies or to fuse them into a single mass. Overall, the focus is on resolving the simulation challenges in ANSYS for the gantry crane project.
Zablorg
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This might be considered a coursework question, insofar as I'm doing it as a student and not a professional, but it's less to do with homework type questions and more to do with software fiddling, so I thought I'd post it here. I apologize if it's not the right forum.

I've been given an assignment to simulate a gantry crane in ANSYS. The geometry is to be constructed by assigning appropriate cross-sections to line bodies, which act as the crane elements. As these elements require different cross-sections, I've needed to use "Add frozen" when generating them so that they don't merge into a single body of uniform cross-section.

Here's the complication; when I try to simulate this in Mechanical after applying constraints and forces, it fails, citing "small equation pivot solver terms". From some research I understand this to mean that the whole thing is under-constrained. And when I simulate the structure as a single line body (with only one cross-section, unfortunately), it works just fine, so the impression I get is that the individual elements I've created aren't connected to each other in any meaningful way.

I have of course looked into methods to manually join the appropriate elements, but none of my many attempts have been successful, and I have little understanding of which of the apparently numerous methods would be appropriate to use.

So my question is ultimately; Is there a standard way to generate a rigid structure out of several independent line bodies? To fuse touching structures into a single mass?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Hi,
I just started using Ansys so I might just try and throw something out there.
Do you think it could be a contact problem? I suggest you look into that
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top