Magnetic moment of a current loop.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the magnetic moment of a current loop using the general formula for magnetic moment, \vec m = \frac{1}{2} \int \vec r \times \vec J(\vec r) d^3\vec r. The challenge lies in proving that \frac{1}{2}\int \vec r d\vec r equals the area vector \vec A of the loop. By confining the current to a planar wire and applying trigonometry, the relationship between the incremental arc length and the area of a triangular wedge is established. This leads to the conclusion that the magnetic moment can be expressed as \vec m = I \vec A. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical connections between current, area, and magnetic moment.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hello, calculating the magnetic moment of a current loop is trivial, but I want to do it with the general formula

\vec m = \frac{1}2 \int \vec r \times \vec J(\vec r) d^3\vec r

The only thing which is stopping me is to find a good argument on why

\frac{1}{2}\int \vec r d\vec r = \vec A where \vec A is the area vector of the loop. Is there a formal way of proving this or any intuitive diagrams one can draw to show that it must be true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with:

\vec m = \frac{1}2 \int \vec r \times \vec J(\vec r) d^3\vec r

If the current is confined to a single planar wire:

\vec J(\vec r) = I δ(z) δ(\vec r-\vec r' )

which leads to:
\vec m = \frac{I}2 \int \vec r' \times \vec d r'
\vec m = \hat{z}\frac{I}2 \int r' sin γ d r'

Now a little bit of trigonometry reveals that sin γ d r' is just the incremental arc length ds of the arc perpendicular to the radial vector:
\vec m = \hat{z} I \int \frac{1}2 r' ds
The incremental wedge swept out by each incremental arc is essentially just a triangle with area of one half the base length times height. Here r' is the length of the triangular wedge, and ds is the height of the wedge, so the integrand is just the area of the wedge:

\vec m =\hat{z} I \int d a
\vec m = I \vec A
 
Last edited:
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top