Muzzle velocity given test range, time of flight and ballistic properties.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the muzzle velocity of an air rifle, considering factors like time of flight, horizontal range, and the effects of air drag on the pellet. The user has derived equations for velocity and distance as functions of time but is uncertain how to isolate the initial velocity. Another participant suggests inverting the derived distance equation to solve for the initial velocity, indicating a potential solution. The conversation highlights the complexities of accounting for air resistance in projectile motion. The user expresses gratitude for the input and acknowledges their fatigue.
Carpet_Diver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This isn't really homework, but I figure this is the most appropriate place to post this... Please do say if you think there is a more likely place it will get answered - I'm new!

Homework Statement
I am trying to calculate the muzzle velocity of an air rifle. I can find the time of flight over a known horizontal range. I know the mass and quadratic velocity damping constant due to air drag of the pellet. I also know that over a reasonable range (20m), air drag cannot be ignored, so \large \dot{x}_0 = \frac{r}{T} is not true.

I will assume the trajectory of the pellet is a parabola, because the trajectory is so flat a parabola is a good enough approximation to real life. I will treat the motion decay problem as one dimensional (along the parabola arc length), so gravity can be ignored from here on.

Relevant equations
X, parabola arc length is known, \large X = T \sqrt{(\frac{r}{T})^{2}+(\frac{g T}{2})^{2}}, where r is horizontal range, and g is gravity.
T, time of flight is known
C, quadratic velocity damping constant is known
M, pellet mass is known
Acceleration due to quadratic velocity damping is given by \Large \ddot{x} = \frac{C \dot{x}^{2}}{M}
\dot{x}_{0}, the initial velocity, is unknown.

The attempt at a solution so far
I have already worked out the arc length, as seen above. I have come up with the following expression for velocity as a function of time, which may, or may not be useful;

\LARGE \dot{x}(t) = \frac{\dot{x}_{0}}{1 + \frac{t C \dot{x}_{0}}{M}}

and an expression for distance, as a function of time;

\LARGE x(t) = \frac{M}{C} ln(1 + \frac{t C \dot{x}_{0}}{M})

I am not really sure what to do next, to get what I want; an expression for \dot{x}_{0} as a function of X, T, C and M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Carpet_Diver said:
This isn't really homework, but I figure this is the most appropriate place to post this... Please do say if you think there is a more likely place it will get answered - I'm new!

Homework Statement
I am trying to calculate the muzzle velocity of an air rifle. I can find the time of flight over a known horizontal range. I know the mass and quadratic velocity damping constant due to air drag of the pellet. I also know that over a reasonable range (20m), air drag cannot be ignored, so \large \dot{x}_0 = \frac{r}{T} is not true.

I will assume the trajectory of the pellet is a parabola, because the trajectory is so flat a parabola is a good enough approximation to real life. I will treat the motion decay problem as one dimensional (along the parabola arc length), so gravity can be ignored from here on.

Relevant equations
X, parabola arc length is known, \large X = T \sqrt{(\frac{r}{T})^{2}+(\frac{g T}{2})^{2}}, where r is horizontal range, and g is gravity.
T, time of flight is known
C, quadratic velocity damping constant is known
M, pellet mass is known
Acceleration due to quadratic velocity damping is given by \Large \ddot{x} = \frac{C \dot{x}^{2}}{M}
\dot{x}_{0}, the initial velocity, is unknown.

The attempt at a solution so far
I have already worked out the arc length, as seen above. I have come up with the following expression for velocity as a function of time, which may, or may not be useful;

\LARGE \dot{x}(t) = \frac{\dot{x}_{0}}{1 + \frac{t C \dot{x}_{0}}{M}}

and an expression for distance, as a function of time;

\LARGE x(t) = \frac{M}{C} ln(1 + \frac{t C \dot{x}_{0}}{M})

I am not really sure what to do next, to get what I want; an expression for \dot{x}_{0} as a function of X, T, C and M.

Assuming that all of your math is correct (I haven't gone through the steps), could you not just take your last expression and invert it for the initial velocity by taking the exponential of both sides?
 
Wow, thanks, I am obviously in need of sleep!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top