Summing sines/cosines (Harmonic Addition Theorem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter omission9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Harmonic Addition Theorem in a mathematical model involving points on a unit circle. The model calculates coordinates based on three points, with one fixed and two free to vary between 0° and 360°. The original poster seeks confirmation that their approach, which incorporates phase differences for the free points, correctly utilizes the theorem. Responses indicate that while the Harmonic Addition Theorem can be applied, clarity on the model's symmetry and purpose is necessary for proper application. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying principles rather than just the formulas.
omission9
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a mathematical model which, in part, does a calculation based on the location of certain points on a unit circle.
I am just working in 2d so for some arbitrary values of a,b,c,d,e,f
In the case of the unit circle equally divided so that I have three points on the unit circle (120° apart) this would look like this:
x=a cos (θ) + b cos (θ) + c cos (θ)
y=d sin (θ) + e sin (θ) + f sin (θ)
Now, I want to examine what happens if any two of these points are "free". That is, only one of the points is fixed and the others may individually take on any value from 0° to 360°.
Here is my question:
In this case I believe the model must use the Harmonic Addition Theorem, yes?
I believe this is the case since the two free positions on the circle have the same period but are out of phase with each other since they are moving independent of each other and can take on any arbitrary value. Is that right?
In this case my model would then look like this (where A and B represent the differences in phase)
x=a cos (θ) + (b cos (θ-A) + c cos (θ-B) )
y=d sin (θ) + (e sin (θ-A) + f sin (θ-B))
Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
omission9 said:
In the case of the unit circle equally divided so that I have three points on the unit circle (120° apart) this would look like this:
x=a cos (θ) + b cos (θ) + c cos (θ)
y=d sin (θ) + e sin (θ) + f sin (θ)

If you are using different points on the circle, you need different arguments i.e. ##\theta_1, \theta_2, \theta_3##.

In any case I believe the formulas you are asking for are the sum-to-product formulas. Look at the bottom of this link: trig formulas, or if you really want the harmonic addition theorem, it's here harmonic addition
 
theorem4.5.9 said:
If you are using different points on the circle, you need different arguments i.e. ##\theta_1, \theta_2, \theta_3##.

In any case I believe the formulas you are asking for are the sum-to-product formulas.

I am not asking for the formulas. I already know those! What am I asking is if this is an appropriate application of the Harmonic Addition Theorem. Is it?
 
In that case I'm not sure what you're asking. I'm not sure what your model is suppose to be or what symmetry you're trying to take advantage of. The harmonic addition theorem is just a formula, so there's not really a wrong application of it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top