I am confused with this equation derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a confusion regarding the transformation of a square root into a 3/2 power in an equation. The clarification provided indicates that the 3/2 power results from differentiation, not merely from the square root. The participant acknowledges their misunderstanding, realizing that the variables must be fully differentiated rather than treated separately. This highlights the importance of understanding differentiation rules in mathematical equations. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the need for careful application of differentiation in mathematical derivations.
rickp
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, please take a look at the image below:
http://tinyurl.com/cnz2sut

I am confused as to how that square root transformed into 3/2 power... Isn't it suppose to be 1/2 power if it's a square root?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The term on the right with the 3/2 power is the result of the differentiation stated by the term on the left.
 
Ahh of course >.< I can't believe I didn't see that. I thought the variables could become a part of the differential d/dt without differentiating the entire equation... My mathematical mistake! lol
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top