How do bonding and antibonding MOs coexist in molecular systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HUMERA.S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding
AI Thread Summary
Bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals (MOs) exist simultaneously due to the principles of linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) and valence bond (VB) theories. Bonding MOs arise from the in-phase overlap of atomic orbitals, while antibonding MOs result from out-of-phase overlap. The wavefunctions for bonding (σg) and antibonding (σu) MOs can be represented mathematically, allowing for analysis of their energy contributions. Bonding electrons contribute to a decrease in potential energy (negative ΔE), whereas antibonding electrons increase potential energy (positive ΔE). This interplay creates a competitive dynamic between bonding and antibonding electrons, effectively canceling each other out in terms of energy contributions, which is reflected in the bond order equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts through mathematical models for a clearer grasp of molecular behavior.
HUMERA.S
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hello..
i have checked various resources but am unable to get a clear idea of how bonding and antibonding MO exist simultaneously? [following that bonding MO results due to in phase overlapping of atomic orbitals while antibonding MO results due to out of phase overlapping]
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
HUMERA.S said:
[following that bonding MO results due to in phase overlapping of atomic orbitals while antibonding MO results due to out of phase overlapping]

that's kind of a simplified, cookie-cutter description of what is actually going on. To really understand what's going on you need to use either the LCAO (linear combination of atomic orbitals) or the VB (valence bond) models.

From either model, you would then need to write out the respective wavefunctions for each. Here's an example of a LCAO approximation for a homonuclear system for 1st period atoms:

σg1s=Cg [1sA + 1sB], for bonding
σu1s*=Cu[1sA-1sB] for anti
where "g" stands for gerade (bonding) and "u" stands for ungerade (antibonding)

As a side-note, you can do similar approximations for ∏-bonds as well. Also, these models can be used for systems larger than simple diatomics.

The functions for both σg and σu can be used to determine the ΔP.E. for bonding vrs antibonding electrons. Therefore, given the mathematical relationship between the two functions above, you should be able to see that the bonding electrons result in -ΔE, where as antibonding electrons result in +ΔE.

Thus, you could think of bonding and antibonding electrons in MO's as if they were in competition. As they each have an equal and opposite effect on the ΔPE, they more or less cancel each other out (as given by the Bond Order equation).
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top