Hydrostatic Pressure Force must be perpendicular

AI Thread Summary
Hydrostatic pressure in fluids acts perpendicularly to the surfaces of a container due to the averaging effect of numerous molecular impacts. While individual molecules can strike at various angles, the forces from non-perpendicular impacts cancel each other out. This results in only the perpendicular components contributing to the overall pressure force. Therefore, the assertion that hydrostatic pressure force must be perpendicular is accurate and not merely a simplification. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping fluid dynamics in physics.
astromajor
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hydrostatic Pressure Force "must" be perpendicular

Hi, I'm taking AP Physics B and we started learning about fluids and pressure. My teacher told me that the pressure of a fluid acting in a a container only applies a perpendicular force to the sides, which doesn't make sense. If you 'zoomed in', molecules could strike the surface of the container at any angle, right? So couldn't the forces be in anything from parallel (well, not really) to perpendicular, and everything in between? Is it just a simplification or literally only the molecules that hit the surface perpendicularly that impart a force? Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


astromajor said:
Hi, I'm taking AP Physics B and we started learning about fluids and pressure. My teacher told me that the pressure of a fluid acting in a a container only applies a perpendicular force to the sides, which doesn't make sense. If you 'zoomed in', molecules could strike the surface of the container at any angle, right? So couldn't the forces be in anything from parallel (well, not really) to perpendicular, and everything in between? Is it just a simplification or literally only the molecules that hit the surface perpendicularly that impart a force? Thanks for your time!

Neither. It's not a simplification and it's not the case that only the perpendicular-hitting molecules impart a force. There are a very large number of molecules involved, so that on average, for every molecule that strikes from one side of perpendicular another molecule has just struck or is about to strike from the other side of perpendicular. Thus, the non-perpendicular components of each impact cancel out on average, leaving only the perpendicular components to impart a force.
 
  • Like
Likes andyrk
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top