Would extraterrestrial bacteria be dangerous to us?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dremmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bacteria
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential dangers of extraterrestrial bacteria upon contact with humans. There is no definitive answer to whether such bacteria would pose a threat, as opinions vary widely. It is suggested that for extraterrestrial bacteria to be harmful or beneficial, they would likely need to share similarities with Earth life to function effectively. The conversation also highlights the idea that bacteria evolved in space may not thrive on Earth due to differences in substrates and environmental conditions. Bacteria designed to infect higher organisms may not be effective against Earth life, as they might struggle to replicate or produce toxins in a foreign host. Overall, the consensus leans toward the notion that extraterrestrial bacteria would face significant challenges in surviving and interacting with Earth’s ecosystems.
Dremmer
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Would extraterrestrial bacteria be dangerous to us if we physically came in contact with such?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There is no good answer to this question. I'm sure people will say things - almost anything anyone can say is pure opinion.

If you stipulated a bunch of conditions the foreign bacteria had to meet then it would be more fun. IMO: It is probably true that they would have to have a lot in common with extant Earth life in order to be able to function in any way either helpful or deleterious.

What we really need is exobacteria that eat air pollutants and synthesize gasoline as a by product... preferably exuded into ready-to-use tanks.
 
In terms of extraterrestrial bacteria evolved to be diseases of higher organisms, they are unlikely to be effective against Earth life.

Bacteria evolved to live on specific substrates might not find a usable food.

Even a bacteria that uses a specific toxin to kill its host might not be able to replicate enough in an Earth host to create a useful amount of toxin.

Essentially, a bacterium evolved away from the Earth would likely struggle to survive on earth.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top