Equation of Virtual Work VS Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The virtual work equation for linear elastic materials resembles the potential energy equation, differing primarily by a (1/2) coefficient in the internal work term of the potential energy equation. This discrepancy arises from the distinct methods of load application in virtual work compared to potential energy calculations. The discussion seeks clarification on the origin of the (1/2) coefficient in the potential energy equation. Participants express confusion regarding the explanation of this coefficient. Understanding the relationship between load application and energy calculations is essential for grasping these concepts.
rdbateman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
For linear elastic materials (3D General)...

The virtual work equation looks exactly like the equation for potential energy except that in the potential energy equation, the internal work term has a (1/2) coefficient. Why are these different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know why the potential energy has a 1/2 coefficient?

It has to do with the method of application of the loads, which is different for VW.
 
That doesn't answer the question.
 
Actually I did provide an answer, albeit very short.

But I still don't know if you understand where the 1/2 comes from.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
Question about potential energy: gravity and a vertical spring
Replies
12
Views
4K
I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Meaning of potential energy in external fields
Replies
19
Views
2K
Potential Energy and Potential -- Systems versus Particles
Replies
6
Views
11K
Regarding the idea of potential energy
Replies
2
Views
1K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K
B The work done by two objects on each other
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Physical interpretation of the "total potential energy"
Replies
20
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top