Understanding the Effects of Inputting High Frequency Signals on an Oscilloscope

AI Thread Summary
Inputting a high-frequency signal into an oscilloscope that exceeds its range can lead to several issues, including incomplete amplitude display and slower rise and fall times. If the frequency is significantly higher, the oscilloscope may not show any waveform at all, instead presenting a DC offset. Aliasing can occur when the sampling frequency is insufficient, resulting in misleading waveforms or low-frequency representations. Digital oscilloscopes can exhibit beat frequencies, revealing low-frequency patterns that are crucial for testing ADC performance. Overall, relying solely on the initial display can obscure important waveform characteristics.
reddvoid
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
what happens if we input higher frequency signal to oscilloscope than its range. How will It respond. . .for example in oscilloscope range is 12 MHz how will it display a signal having rise time of say some 40 nano seconds ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Usually it just does not displace the full amplitude, the rising and falling edge is slower than the real signal. If the signal is a lot higher in frequency, it might not even display any waveform, but show up as some DC offset.
 
It can also alias when its sampling frequency is too low for the input signal. That shows up as a nonsense waveform, or it can show up as a low-frequency waveform (which can be very confusing).
 
Yes, I kept thinking about analog scope. For digital scope, you can have beat frequency that you can see low frequency patterns when the input frequency come close to half clock, clock frequency, 2 clock and so on. That's how I test the A to D front end when I was working for LeCroy long time ago. In fact, these are the most important test on how good the ADC is. You see missing codes using these beat frequency technique.
 
yungman said:
Usually it just does not displace the full amplitude, the rising and falling edge is slower than the real signal. If the signal is a lot higher in frequency, it might not even display any waveform, but show up as some DC offset.

berkeman said:
It can also alias when its sampling frequency is too low for the input signal. That shows up as a nonsense waveform, or it can show up as a low-frequency waveform (which can be very confusing).

yungman said:
Yes, I kept thinking about analog scope. For digital scope, you can have beat frequency that you can see low frequency patterns when the input frequency come close to half clock, clock frequency, 2 clock and so on. That's how I test the A to D front end when I was working for LeCroy long time ago. In fact, these are the most important test on how good the ADC is. You see missing codes using these beat frequency technique.

Definitely!
Basically, there are many worse things possible than just a soggy high frequency response and you can miss all sorts of characteristics of a waveform if you take what you see as the literal truth. Scopes, these days try to think for you and you can lose important features if you take the first picture you see as gospel.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...

Similar threads

Back
Top