Feynman's Nobel classical electrodynamics action

AI Thread Summary
Feynman's Nobel lecture presents an electrodynamic action in 4-vector form, which describes interactions between particles. A request is made to re-express this action for a pair of particles in 3-vector form, noting the relationship to the Darwin Lagrangian. The key distinction is that Feynman's action uses each particle's proper time, while the Darwin Lagrangian employs a universal time. Converting to 3-vector form involves replacing variables and results in a double integral over trajectories, contrasting with the single integral of the Darwin Lagrangian. The motions described by each action differ significantly, with the Darwin Lagrangian serving as an approximation of Feynman's formulation.
johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
In his Nobel lecture Feynman describes an electrodynamic action between a set of particles (equation 1, one third way thru lecture):

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html

The action is in 4-vector form.

I wonder if someone could do me a favour and re-express the action just for a pair of particles in 3-vector form?

I presume the action is related to the Darwin Lagrangian. The main difference between them is that in the Feynman action each particle has its own proper time whereas the Darwin lagrangian is expressed in a universal time.

Thanks,

John
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it should be easy if you just replace X^i by (ct_i,\mathbf r_i) in the integral and play a little with the formula. However, the resulting action will contain double integral over two trajectories, while the action for the Darwin Lagrangian is just an integral of certain function over coordinate time. The motions described by the two are quite different in general; the motion due to the action with Darwin Lagrangian can be thought of as best approximation to the motion implied by the Feynman action, possible with action that uses just coordinates and velocities at common time.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top