What Causes Elliptical Galaxies to be Elliptical?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shounakbhatta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies
AI Thread Summary
Elliptical galaxies primarily form from the merger of two or more galaxies, which disrupts their original spiral shapes and results in an ellipsoidal appearance due to gravitational forces and angular momentum. The discussion references the density wave theory, which was previously thought to explain the spiral shapes of galaxies, but recent research challenges its validity, suggesting that spiral arms may not be stationary features as previously believed. Observational studies have shown no significant angular offsets in star formation tracers that would support the existence of long-lived spiral patterns. This indicates that the dynamics of spiral galaxies are more complex than the density wave theory suggests. Overall, elliptical galaxies' shapes are a consequence of their formation processes rather than a result of ongoing structural dynamics.
shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I read that the density wave theory makes up the shape of the spiral galaxies look spiral? Is there any specific reason for elliptical galaxies to make the shape of a ellipse?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptical_galaxy

The above may help. Since they seem to form from the merger of two or more galalxies, the original spiral shape gets lost and the ellipsoid result seems to be the natural shape resulting from gravity and angular momentum.
 
Thanks for the information. I read through wikipedia. It says mostly they are formed by mergers of other galaxies.
 
shounakbhatta said:
Hello,

I read that the density wave theory makes up the shape of the spiral galaxies look spiral?
This theory seems to have been recently falsified:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.5141

"Observational Evidence Against Long-Lived Spiral Arms in Galaxies"
Kelly Foyle, Hans-Walter Rix, Clare Dobbs, Adam Leroy, Fabian Walter
(Submitted on 25 May 2011)

Abstract: We test whether the spiral patterns apparent in many large disk galaxies should be thought of as dynamical features that are stationary in a co-rotating frame for > t_{dyn}, as implied by the density wave approach for explaining spiral arms. If such spiral arms have enhanced star formation (SF), observational tracers for different stages of the SF sequence should show a spatial ordering, from up-stream to downstream in the corotating frame: dense HI, CO, tracing molecular hydrogen gas, 24 micron emission tracing enshrouded SF and UV emission tracing unobscured young stars. We argue that such a spatial ordering should be reflected in the angular cross-correlation (CC, in polar coordinates) using all azimuthal positions among pairs of these tracers; the peak of the CC should be offset from zero, in different directions inside and outside the corotation radius. Recent spiral SF simulations by Dobbs & Pringle, show explicitly that for the case of a stationary spiral arm potential such angular offsets between gas and young stars of differing ages should be observable as cross-correlation offsets. We calculate the angular cross-correlations for different observational SF sequence tracers in 12 nearby spiral galaxies, drawing on a data set with high quality maps of the neutral gas HI, THINGS), molecular gas (CO, HERACLES) along with 24 micron emission (Spitzer, SINGS); we include FUV images (GALEX) and 3.6 $\mu$m emission (Spitzer, IRAC) for some galaxies, tracing aging stars and longer timescales. In none of the resulting tracer cross-correlations for this sample do we find systematic angular offsets, which would be expected for a stationary dynamical spiral pattern of well-defined pattern speed. This result indicates that spiral density waves in their simplest form are not an important aspect of explaining spirals in large disk galaxies.
 
So where do we stand?
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Back
Top