Why am I having trouble with the RC circuit analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion in analyzing an RC low-pass filter circuit, specifically regarding the relationships between input voltage (Vin), output voltage (Vout), and current. The user struggles with understanding the phase relationships, particularly at high and low frequencies, and how these affect the expected behavior of the circuit. It is clarified that at high frequencies, the output voltage lags the input voltage by 90 degrees due to the capacitor's behavior, while at low frequencies, the output voltage approaches the input voltage, leading to a phase shift that may not align with expectations. The importance of accurately representing these voltages in a phasor diagram is emphasized, with suggestions to draw all relevant phasors to clarify their relationships. Ultimately, the user realizes that their previous definitions of Vout and Vin were incorrect, which contributes to their misunderstanding of the phase shifts in the circuit.
schaefera
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to analyze the RC circuit... specifically a low-pass filter, so the set up is voltage source to resistor to capacitor, and the voltage source provides an oscillating voltage Vin, whereas I measure Vout across the capacitor.

I think I'm getting confused between two different possible analyses: first, comparing Vin and Vout and second, comparing the current and the voltage in the circuit. Please tell me where I'm going wrong.

If I consider the ratio Vout/Vin, I have the complex number: 1/(1+iwRC) which has the phase phi1= -arctan(wRC). This would imply that at very high w, the output voltage is 90 degrees behind the input voltage. But since at very high w the capacitor drops very little voltage, this circuit is essentially just a resistor dropping all the voltage. So why wouldn't we expect the output and input voltages to be IN phase in this case? Similarly, at very low w the capacitor drops most of the voltage and despite the fact that the phase angle approaches 0 in this limit. Since a purely capacitive circuit has a 90 degree phase shift, shouldn't we expect this shift to be present in that case?

I think it would be easier if I could draw a phasor diagram, but I can only draw a phasor diagram to compare Vout (which would be the sum of capacitive voltage and resistive voltage, the two being at right angles to each other) to the current (which is parallel to the resistive voltage)... I wouldn't know where to place Vin on such a diagram would I?

Again, I think I'm getting confused between looking at Vout/Vin and Vout/Total current. Please tell me where my errors are! Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
schaefera said:
Hello, I'm trying to analyze the RC circuit... specifically a low-pass filter, so the set up is voltage source to resistor to capacitor, and the voltage source provides an oscillating voltage Vin, whereas I measure Vout across the capacitor.

I think I'm getting confused between two different possible analyses: first, comparing Vin and Vout and second, comparing the current and the voltage in the circuit. Please tell me where I'm going wrong.

If I consider the ratio Vout/Vin, I have the complex number: 1/(1+iwRC) which has the phase phi1= -arctan(wRC). This would imply that at very high w, the output voltage is 90 degrees behind the input voltage. But since at very high w the capacitor drops very little voltage, this circuit is essentially just a resistor dropping all the voltage. So why wouldn't we expect the output and input voltages to be IN phase in this case?

The current is (almost) in phase with Vin in this limit (ϕI = arctan(1/ωRC)). However, the voltage on the capacitor depends on how much charge it has. q = CV therefore dq/dt = i = Cdv/dt, where v is the capacitor voltage here. So what's happening is that, when Vin, and therefore the current, are at a maximum, the rate at which charge is accumulating on the plates is a maximum. So the capacitor voltage is only just ramping up to its maximum value. Hence the 90 degree phase lag. Once the capacitor voltage reaches a maximum value, dv/dt = 0, and hence i = 0, which is consistent with what is happening with the voltage source, which has already decreased in voltage down to 0, and is now going negative. Once it goes negative, the capacitor voltage is now greater than the source voltage, and the current reverses direction. The current i becomes large and negative, which means that the capacitor is discharging and its voltage is ramping down to its minimum (trailing the current in phase by 90 deg). Repeat this cycle over and over again.

schaefera said:
Similarly, at very low w the capacitor drops most of the voltage and despite the fact that the phase angle approaches 0 in this limit. Since a purely capacitive circuit has a 90 degree phase shift, shouldn't we expect this shift to be present in that case?

No, because here you have i = dv/dt = 0, and therefore Vout = Vin.

schaefera said:
I think it would be easier if I could draw a phasor diagram, but I can only draw a phasor diagram to compare Vout (which would be the sum of capacitive voltage and resistive voltage, the two being at right angles to each other) to the current (which is parallel to the resistive voltage)... I wouldn't know where to place Vin on such a diagram would I?

Again, I think I'm getting confused between looking at Vout/Vin and Vout/Total current. Please tell me where my errors are! Thank you!

I see no reason why you can't draw all three phasors on the same diagram.
 
Let's say I draw Vr, the voltage across the resistor, and some angle up from the horizontal axis. Vc, the capacitor's voltage, is 90 degrees behind that. Their sum, which depends on relative lengths, falls somewhere between those two and that would be Vout correct? Where do I draw Vin?
 
Is your problem with where you are putting your voltmeter so that you are apparently getting a phase shift in one case and not in the other?
Relate everything to Earth, to make it easier. If you draw the circuit with the C, connected between Earth and the Resistor and you then connect the source PD to the resistor. The voltage you measure (to Earth) across the capacitor will always be in quadrature with the volts of the supply - just getting less and less as the frequency increases. The phasor diagram can be drawn with Vr along the x axis, Vc along the y-axis and Vin will be the diagonal joining those two vectors. Note, I have not used "Vout" because that would either be Vc or Vr, depending on your choice of which one is the 'output'
 
Aha! So let me see if I got this right: what I've been calling Vout is really Vc, and Vin is the total of all voltages, what I've called Vtot. So, that's why I've been having the issue with phase shifts-- if phi is the angle by which current and voltage are out of phase, that's the same as the angle between Vin and Vr (because Vr is in phase with current). But the difference between Vin and Vc (or Vout, as I've used before) is actually 90 degrees MINUS phi, since we're measuring from Vc, and not from Vr, to Vtot?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top