Harmonic oscillation with friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on incorporating kinetic friction into the dynamics of a harmonic oscillator, specifically a block attached to a spring on a table. The forces at play include the spring force and kinetic friction, which opposes the velocity but is not proportional to it. The differential equation governing the motion is x''(t) = -kx - F_friction, where F_friction depends on the direction of the velocity. Solutions to the system differ based on the sign of the friction force, leading to a piecewise approach where the motion transitions between two states as the velocity changes. Ultimately, the displacement graph reveals a series of half-oscillations with linearly decreasing amplitudes, stopping when static friction balances the spring's tension.
nos
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I want to include kinetic friction into the harmonic oscillator.
A small blocks is attached to a horiontal spring on a table.
Because there is kinetic friction there are two forces on the blok that we need to describe the oscillation.

First, the force that the spring exerts and second, the kinetic friction.
The kinetic friction is always opposite to the velocity but it is not proportional to velocity.

The differential equation is:

x''(t)=-kx-F_{friction}

How can I rewrite Fore of friction to solve this equation? force of friction is not just a constant since it depends on the direction of the velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean that F_\mathrm{friction}(t) = \mu x' (t)?

How would you solve it without the friction term? I guess you would make an Ansatz for the form of the solution such as x(t) = e^{\lambda t} ?
 
CompuChip said:
You mean that F_\mathrm{friction}(t) = \mu x' (t)?

How would you solve it without the friction term? I guess you would make an Ansatz for the form of the solution such as x(t) = e^{\lambda t} ?

Most engineers (at least in the UK and US) would call that "viscous damping", not "friction".

For the Coulomb model of friction, F in the OP's equation is constant, and its sign depends on the sign of the velocity.

You can easily solve the two separate cases where F is positive or negative. The solution is the same as if the mass and spring was vertical, and F was the weight of the mass.

For the complete solution, you start with one of the two solutions (depending on the initial conditiosn) until the velocity = 0, then you switch to the other solution, and so on. You can't easily get a single equation that gives the complete solution in one "formula" for x.

The graph of displacement against time will look like a sequence of half-oscillations of simple harmonic motion, with amplitudes that decrease in a linear progression (not exponentially). The mass will stop moving after a finite number of half-osciillations, at some position where the static friction force can balance the tension in the spring.
 
Thank you very much for replying:)
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top