Sleep vs. Cramming: Which is Better for Tests?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MostlyHarmless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sleep
AI Thread Summary
When faced with a test in six hours and minimal preparation, two strategies emerge: a thorough six-hour study session or a 4.5-hour review followed by 1.5 hours of rest. The latter approach is suggested to be more effective due to biological factors related to memory consolidation. Key processes in learning include Acquisition, Consolidation, and Recall. A brief nap can enhance memory consolidation and reduce adenosine levels, which can impair cognitive function. Additionally, caffeine can further boost alertness post-nap. The discussion emphasizes the importance of structured study habits, such as breaking study sessions into smaller, manageable parts over time, rather than cramming, which is viewed as a less effective approach. Overall, prioritizing rest and strategic review is advocated for better test performance.
MostlyHarmless
Messages
344
Reaction score
15
Suppose you had a test in 6 hours and you are not prepared for it in the least, it would take you 6 hours to make it through each topic in enough detail to learn the material under normal circumstances. Or it would take you ~4.5 hours to briefly review each topic enough to be familiar with it, leaving you ~1.5 hours to rest your brain and perhaps take a nap.

I've heard, I can't remember where, that the you would likely do better on your test with the second strategy. Assuming this is true, which I tend to think it is, based on limited experience with long study sessions, what is going on biologically that makes you better able to recall the new information more effectively?

First instinct would follow the same process of thought in this thread concerning "why we sleep": https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=710628
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Learning and memory is often described in terms of three processes namely "Acquisition" the introduction of new info to the brain, "Consolidation" integration of info in the brain that makes a stable and accessible memory, and finally "Recall" ability to access memory consciously or sub-consciously.

Imo, the second cramming strategy is more effective because of the short nap which gives opportunity for the brain to consolidate and also to get rid of the accumulated adenosine in the brain which slow down brain activity. Caffeine is antagonist of adenosine, drinking a cup of coffee when you woke up I think will take care of the remaining adenosine in the brain making you alert and ready for the exam.

Imo, review would be easy if you facilitated the stages of the learning process. Being attentive during lectures facilitates Acquisition, paraphrased lecture notes with your own vocabulary facilitates Consolidation, and mnemonics facilitates Recall. And most of all curiosity facilitates learning.
 
I also agree, the second session would be better than the first. Giving your brain that extra 1.5 hours of rest is a good thing, compared to 6 straight hours of cramming. Not to mention a nice break. ::-p:

Then again, who would cram the day of an exam? I think that's personally a bad habit people tend to have, I've done it multiple times, but I've come to learn otherwise. (Hint, hint.)

I actually find it easier to study in little sessions a day. If I have an exam coming up in one week, then I'll spend a few hours working on problems, concepts, and going over previous homework per day. Then I'll spend the weekend skimming over stuff to make sure I got it down. When it comes the day of the exam, I usually just quickly skim my notes and then do other homework that day or something; then test time.

I'm not sure why I posted all of that, but yeah the second option would be better, in my opinion anyway. I'm sure someone could back the first option up though.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom

Similar threads

Back
Top