E/M Constant: Mass Conversion in Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter nil1996
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between mass and energy in the universe, specifically referencing the equation E=mc^2. It clarifies that while the speed of light is constant, this does not imply a conservation law for mass and energy. The first law of thermodynamics states that the total mass and energy in the universe remains unchanged, but mass-energy equivalence does not dictate a fixed proportion between the two. Participants emphasize that E represents the energy associated with mass, not the total energy of the universe. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the clarified concepts.
nil1996
Messages
301
Reaction score
7
As the speed of light is constant in the universe, E/M should be constant.
Suppose that in some corner of universe mass is being converted in energy. So there must be some another corner of universe where mass is being converted into energy at the same time.Is my argument correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nil1996 said:
As the speed of light is constant in the universe, E/M should be constant.
Suppose that in some corner of universe mass is being converted in energy. So there must be some another corner of universe where mass is being converted into energy at the same time.Is my argument correct??

Sorry, but this makes no sense.

You are confusing an equation that describes the conversion of one to another with a conservation law. That equation is not a conservation law just because c is a constant.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
E=mc^2 is an equation that describes the constant of proportionality between an object's rest mass, and the energy that mass contains.

The sum total of mass and energy in the universe has to remain unchanged by the first law of thermodynamics, but mass energy equivalence does not indicate that there must be a certain proportion between the two when you sum all the mass and energy in the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thanks,
i was thinking that E represents energy of universe while M mass of universe ant that equation works as conservation of energy.
 
nil1996 said:
thanks,
i was thinking that E represents energy of universe while M mass of universe ant that equation works as conservation of energy.
E would represent all the energy due to all the mass in the universe, not the total energy in the universe. Hope that makes sense
 
sigma_ said:
E would represent all the energy due to all the mass in the universe, not the total energy in the universe. Hope that makes sense

yes got now
Thanks :thumbs:
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top