Time for an object to fall to a larger one

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaikalii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for an object to fall towards the Earth from a significant distance, beyond the Earth's radius. The initial approach using the equation of motion is deemed insufficient for such distances, leading to the consideration of gravitational dynamics described by f''(t)=GM/(f(t))^2. The trajectory of the falling object resembles a degenerate ellipse, similar to the moon's orbit, and requires the use of energy conservation principles to derive the time of fall. The integral for this calculation is complex but can be solved using integral tables or numerical methods. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to explore the gravitational two-body problem for more general scenarios involving larger masses.
kaikalii
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I know that for short distances from the Earth's surface, x=-1/2gt^2+vt+x works fine for finding the time it takes for an object to fall a certain distance ignoring air resistance.
However, what if the distance is many times the Earth's radius?
The only thing I can think of to start solving this problem is f''(t)=GM/(f(t))^2, but try as I might, I cannot solve that to evaluate the time and object takes to fall, say, a distance, r. How can I accomplish this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming you're talking about a body whose mass is much smaller than the Earth's, dropped with zero velocity from an arbitrary distance from the Earth. If so, please check out this article or this one. Basically the body follows a degenerate ellipse trajectory, similar to the trajectory of the moon around the earth. The equations aren't as easy to solve as the mgh potential because they're non linear, but if you want the time in terms of initial position, you write down the energy per unit mass, which is a conserved quantity (and should be negative if you're effectively falling and not escaping the Earth): E = E_0 = T + U = (dr/dt)^2/2 - \mu/r, solve for dt and integrate: $$ \int_{t_0}^t dt = t - t_0 = \int_{r_0}^r \frac{dr}{\sqrt{2(E_0+\mu /r)}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\mu}}\int_{r_0}^r \sqrt{\frac{r}{1-\alpha r}}dr $$ with \alpha = -E_0/\mu > 0, if I didn't mess up the algebra. The integral may found in integral tables or WolframAlpha, or computed numerically.

For the more general problem where you can have non-zero velocity and a body with a large mass, read into the gravitational two-body problem, or the Kepler problem if you're not interested in large masses.
 
Last edited:
Thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for.
 
I've added some stuff to my answer, maybe you'd like to check it out :)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top