Nodes and antinodes in stationary waves

AI Thread Summary
In stationary waves formed in a string clamped at one end and free at the other, a node occurs at the clamped end due to the inability of particles to move, while an antinode forms at the free end where particles can move. The formation of an antinode is explained by the reflection of wave energy at the free end, which is not a perfect reflector, allowing some energy to dissipate into the air. Although the free end allows movement, it does not achieve maximum amplitude due to this energy loss, challenging the idea of a perfect antinode. The discussion also touches on related phenomena in wind instruments and other musical devices, where similar principles apply. Understanding these mechanisms clarifies the behavior of stationary waves in various contexts.
arvindsharma
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends,

in my textbook it is written that when a stationary wave is formed in a string which is clamped at one end and free at the other end then a node is produced at the clamped end and an Anti-node is produced at the free end.the explanation given is that since at clamped particle can't move so a node is formed(i am also agree with the mechanism of node formation)) and at free end since the particle can move so an anti-node is formed.my doubt is that why anti-node is formed at free end,why can't there be a situation where particle can move but does not achieve the maximum amplitude.i mean why can't there be a situation where particle at free end behaves like in-between node and Anti-node positions.please explain me the whole mechanism.

Thanks

Arvind
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to PF.
That's a good question and there are possible answers at various levels. The answer that I like best is as follows.

Firstly, let's just go over how a standing wave is formed. It's basically what happens when a wave in one direction encounters another wave (at the same frequency) from the other direction. The resulting interference gives you a stationary pattern of nodes and antinodes. The traveling wave that is approaching the clamped end cannot couple any energy to the clamp because the clamp is too massive and rigid. All the wave energy has to go somewhere and the only possible place it can go is in a 100% reflected wave, back down the string with a node at the clamp. A wave approaching the free end will actually a small amount of energy into wafting the air up and down. Most of the energy will go back from the end in the form of a reflected wave. But the free end is not, actually, a perfect reflector ; some energy can be lost to the air, so the wave at this point is not actually a perfect antinode.
You are therefore, right about not having a true antinode at the far end - good thinking.

Wind instruments have a hole / horn at the end and there is a massive 'end effect' as the energy delivered as musical sound forces a different actual frequency than would be suggested b y the physical length of the pipe. Quartz crystals, as used in oscillators, are clamped at two points, not quite at the ends, rather than right at the end because of a similar 'end effect'. Also, look at a child's glockenspiel bars, they are also mounted on nodes but there is always an overlap at each end.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top