Solving x^y=y^x & x+y=6 with Deduction

  • Thread starter Thread starter arka.sharma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equations x^y = y^x and x+y = 6. Possible solutions identified include (x=4, y=2), (x=3, y=3), and (x=2, y=4). A graphical approach is suggested to solve the equation (6-y)^y = y^(6-y), where plotting both sides can help identify intersection points. It is noted that while graphical and numerical methods can be used, there is no straightforward algebraic solution. The conversation emphasizes the utility of visual representation in finding and proving all potential roots.
arka.sharma
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was given two equations back in my school days to solve for both x and y it is as follows

x^y = y^x & x+y = 6

Now it can be seen that following would be possible solutions (x=4,y=2),(x=3,y=3),(x=2,y=4).
But is there any deductive way to solve this ?

Regards,
Arka
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solving (6-y)^y == y^(6-y)
Which can be represented graphically.
 
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
 
Put the RHS and the LHS of the equation on a graphic and see where these curve cut each other.
You will find the root that you already know.
If there are other roots, you will likely find out.
Afterward, you might find out arguments to "prove" you found all the roots.
The graphical representation will help a lot.
 
arka.sharma said:
Thanks for your reply. But how to solve the equation (6-y)^y == y^(6-y) ?
You were told to solve it graphically. It can also be solved using a numerical iteration method. If you are looking for an elementary algebraic way of solving it, there is none.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top