Can These Hydrocarbons Be Properly Named According to IUPAC Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin macks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrocarbon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proper IUPAC naming of two compounds. The first compound can be correctly named as 1-amino-4-methylcyclohexane, while the second can be named as 1-amino-2-methylcyclohexane. Both names adhere to IUPAC rules, despite minor typographical errors. The alternative names referenced in the discussion do not conform to these rules and may instead reflect common naming conventions used by professionals familiar with methylcyclohexane and its derivatives. The importance of following IUPAC guidelines for clarity and standardization in chemical nomenclature is emphasized.
kelvin macks
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
can I name the first compund as 1-amino-4-methylcyclohaeaxne?
can i name the second compound as 1-amino-2-methyl-cyclohexane? why and why not?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0021.jpg
    DSC_0021.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 535
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Apart from a few typos(*), your names follow the IUPAC rules, while the ones in the picture do not. They might be common names for people working with methylcyclohexane and their derivatives.

(*) 1-amino-4-methylcyclohexane and 1-amino-2-methylcyclohexane
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top