Metric Tensor in Spherical Coordinates

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
I recently derived a matrix which I believe to be the metric tensor in spherical polar coordinates in 3-D. Here were the components of the tensor that I derived. I will show my work afterwards:

g11 = sin2(ø) + cos2(θ)

g12 = -rsin(θ)cos(θ)

g13 = rsin(ø)cos(ø)

g21 = -rsin(θ)cos(θ)

g22 = r2sin2(ø) + r2sin2(θ)

g23 = 0

g31 = rsin(ø)cos(ø)

g32 = 0

g33 = r2cos2(ø)

The above is what I derived, but when I tried to verify to see if my answer was correct by checking various websites, I did not see any site have what I derived.

Here is my work:

The axes were:

x1 = r

x2 = θ

x3 = ø

The vector that I differentiated was:

<rcos(θ)sin(ø) , rsin(θ)sin(ø) , rcos(θ)>

I then differentiated the vector with respect to the various axes in order to derive my tangential basis vectors.

Here were my basis vectors:

er = <cos(θ)sin(ø) , sin(θ)sin(ø), cos(θ)>

eθ = <-rsin(θ)sin(ø), rcos(θ)sin(ø) , -rsin(θ)>

eø = <rcos(θ)cos(ø), rsin(θ)cos(ø) , 0>

Finally, I did the dot product with these basis vectors to derive the components of my metric tensor.

That is how I got what I derived, but I don't see any confirmation of this online.

Can anyone please either verify if I am right with this metric tensor or tell me where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
space-time said:
The vector that I differentiated was:

<rcos(θ)sin(ø) , rsin(θ)sin(ø) , rcos(θ)>

The transformation to spherical polar coordinates is

x = r sin(θ) cos(ø)
y = r sin(θ) sin(ø)
z = r cos(θ)

r = <r sin(θ) cos(ø), r sin(θ) sin(ø), r cos(θ)>
 
Bill_K said:
The transformation to spherical polar coordinates is

x = r sin(θ) cos(ø)
y = r sin(θ) sin(ø)
z = r cos(θ)

r = <r sin(θ) cos(ø), r sin(θ) sin(ø), r cos(θ)>

So I made a careless mistake it seems. Thank you Bill K.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top