Relativity situation. Questions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter hedons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a bomb with a trigger set to detonate at a specific critical mass will activate when traveling at 99.9% the speed of light, with the trigger sample at 99.99% of that mass. It concludes that the bomb will not detonate, as the trigger sample's mass remains unchanged in its own rest frame despite the high velocity. The concept of relativistic mass is debated, with some physicists preferring to focus on rest mass and relativistic momentum instead. The momentum of the bomb and measuring device remains consistent across different frames of reference, ensuring that mass measurements are unaffected by the bomb's speed. Ultimately, the bomb's operation is determined by its rest frame conditions, not the relative motion.
hedons
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Situation:

You have a bomb which will detonate if the input sample on its trigger is of a certain mass (we'll call this the critical mass).

The trigger input sample has a mass equal to 99.99% of the critical mass.

A person takes this device on spaceship which begins to accellerate towards its top speed of 99.9% the speed of light.

Will the bomb detonate?

Thanks,
Glenn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you do not accelerate too quickly (which creates G-forces) then no, the trigger input sample doesn't change in its own rest frame. Remember, velocity is all relative anyway--even if the bomb is at rest on earth, it is already moving at 99.99% of light speed in some other frame. Also, it should be noted that many physicists don't like to use the concept of "relativistic mass" at all, instead just talking about rest mass (which never changes) and relativistic momentum--see Does mass change with velocity? from the Usenet Physics FAQ.
 
The problem is in considering the mass measuring device (MMD). For someone in motion relative to the bomb, everything in the bomb frame (bomb and MMD) has a momentum equal to:

P = m v \gamma

So the momentum of everything in the bomb frame (relative to the moving frame) is increased by the same factor, so any device which measured mass based on collisions would operate exactly the same as it would in the bomb's rest frame.
 
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Train Fall Paradox A train is running on a long bridge over a river. A series of bombs planted on the bridge by terrorists explode simultaneously, and the bridge collapses into dust in an instant. The train falls while keeping its cars in a horizontal line and hits the river. All the cars receive equal damage. However, in the inertial frame of reference in which the train had been at rest, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the bombs at the front explode earlier. The first car falls...