Cat & Mouse Chase: Who Will Win?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iceman632
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a mathematical problem is posed involving a cat and a mouse in a square, with the mouse starting at the origin and the cat at (1, 0). The mouse moves vertically with a constant velocity, while the cat, moving twice as fast, always directs its movement towards the mouse's current position. The goal is to determine whether the mouse can reach the point (0, 1) before being caught by the cat. The conversation highlights the need for a mathematical proof, suggesting the use of differential equations to analyze the situation. The relationship between the problem and the golden ratio is also mentioned as an interesting aspect to explore.
iceman632
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Long ago, I stumbled across the following problem:
Assume we have a square with length of the of 1 located in the origin of the coordinate system. Let's have a mouse in the origin (0, 0), too. Let's have a cat in the neighbor corner (1, 0). This is at the time t = 0-.

At t=0+, both cat and mouse start moving. Mouse always moves along y-axis with constant veocity v << 1. Thus, after some finite time tm = 1 / v it will finish its journey in (0, 1). The mouse "wins" if it comes there before

Cat, however, wants to stop it in achieving this. It is moving twice as fast (2 * v) and is always moving towards the mouse. That is, vector vc of the cat's speed is always directed to the (0, ym), where ym is the current position of the mouse. If the cat catches a mouse, it, of course, "wins" the game.

Who will win?

It's not a life matter, but I would really like to find the solution to this. I tried some computer simulation and got some results, but I need some kind of mathematical-only proof. Thanks for any replies!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Let y(x) be the curve in the xy-plane traced out by the cat.
Hence, the cat's position vector as a function of time is (x(t),y(x(t)))

2. Set up the info you've got, and remember that we have \frac{dt}{dx}=\frac{1}{\frac{dx}{dt}} when changing independent variables.

3. You should get a 2.order diff eq for y.
4. As a further exercise, find out how the golden ratio is related to this problem..:wink:
 
Last edited:
I will surely look into this solution. However, I really thought that I would avoid differential equations... :frown: Seems like this is impossible in real life.

Thank you very much for your reply and all the best in New 2006!
 
Yes, it is generally impossible to avoid differential equations in motion problems!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top