Question: A metal sphere of radius R carries a total charge Q

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force of repulsion between the northern and southern hemispheres of a charged metal sphere with radius R and total charge Q. The electric field E is determined to be E = Q/(8πε₀R²), and the surface charge density σ is σ = Q/(4πR²). The integral for the force is established as ∫₀²π ∫₀^(π/2) (Q² sinθ/(32π²ε₀R²))(sinθ cosφ eₓ + sinθ sinφ eᵧ + cosθ e𝓏) dθ dφ. The symmetry of the problem simplifies the analysis by indicating that the x and y components of the force vanish.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically Coulomb's law.
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations and surface charge density.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and integration techniques.
  • Basic grasp of symmetry in physics problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from surface charge distributions.
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in spherical coordinates.
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in electrostatic force calculations.
  • Investigate the applications of Tesla's principles in electrostatics.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and force calculations involving charged objects.

siddharth
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
1,142
Reaction score
0
Question: A metal sphere of radius R carries a total charge Q. What is the force of repulsion between the "northen" hemisphere and the "southern" hemisphere?

The force for a small area 'da' on the outer surface should be

df = \sigma da E

What E to use? My guess is that it should be averaged over both sides of the surface.
So,

E = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^2} + 0)
\vec{E} = \frac{Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R^2} \vec{e_r}

and

\sigma = \frac{Q}{4 \pi R^2}

And the answer should be

\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{Q^2 \sin\theta}{32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^2}(\sin\theta \cos\phi \vec{e_x} + \sin\theta \sin\phi \vec{e_y} + \cos\theta \vec{e_z}) d\theta d\phi

Is my approach correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but you should follow Tesla's advice and recognize from the beginning that the x and y components of F vanish due to the axial symmetry.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Yes, but you should follow Tesla's advice and recognize from the beginning that the x and y components of F vanish due to the axial symmetry.

Thanks Meir Achuz. That would have been my next step. Stating that F_x and F_y are zero by symmetry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
762
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K