Find Sum of Series a^2: Law, Examples, Types

  • Thread starter Thread starter heaven eye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the sum of the series for n^2, highlighting that it is neither an arithmetic nor a geometric series. The formula for the sum of squares is presented as ∑ from n = 1 to m for n^2 = [m(m+1)(2m+1)]/6, with an example calculation provided. Participants explain that the differences between consecutive squares form a sequence of consecutive odd numbers, leading to consistent second differences. Additionally, the conversation touches on higher powers and the complexity of deriving their sums. Overall, the thread clarifies the nature of the series and the derivation of the sum of squares formula.
heaven eye
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
a series such as :-

∑ from n = 1 ,until m for n

can be found with the law of the sum of arithmetical series:-

[m(2a+(m-1)d)]/2
where :-
m= the number of terms
a= the first term in the series
d= the basic arithmetical

in the pervious example :-

a=1 , d=1 , m=m

when we solve the last information in the law we find :-

∑ from n = 1 ,until m for n = m(m+1)/2

for example :-
1+2+3+4+...+18+19+20 = 20(20+1)/2 = 210


my question is :-

what about the series :-

∑ from n = 1 ,until m for n^2 ?


it isn't an artithmetical or even a geometrical series then :-

what kind of series is it ?

and how could they find that :-
∑ from n = 1 ,until m for n^2 = [m(m+1)(2m+1)]/6 ?

for example :-

(1^2)+(2^2)+(3^2)+(4^2)+(5^2)= 5(5+1)(2*5+1)/6 = 55


and thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not an arithmetic series, obviously. In an arithmetic series, by definition, the difference between two consecutive terms must always be the same. But in 1, 22= 4, 32= 9, 42= 16, ..., the differences are 4-1 =3, 9- 4= 5, 16- 9= 7,...

Notice, however, those differences are consecutive odd numbers: the "second differences" 5-3. 7- 5, ... are all 2. Obviously, for the sum of squares, the first difference is the squares themselves so the "third differences" are all 2. "Newton's divided difference formula" gives us
\sum_{i=0}^n i^2= \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}

Similar things can be done for higher powers but the results get progressively more difficult.
 
Well sorry I was late to repost cause of exams

well thank you mr.HallsofIvy for your answer, now it is more clear to me



my reagrds
 
If you want to put time into it, you can assume that the sum of the integers has a leading square factor, the sum of the squares has a leading cube term, the sum of third powers, etc. (This follows from HallsofIvy above.)

We then attempt to find terms ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=S(x)

We know that S(0) = 0 and so d=0. S(1) = a+b+c=1, S(2)=8a+4b+2c=5, S(3) = 27a+9b+3c=14. So we can solve these equations by elimination of terms.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top