What Is the Role of Vacuum Fluctuations in the Universe's Origin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RAD4921
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of the universe and the role of vacuum fluctuations in the Big Bang. It clarifies that zero-point energy (ZPE) cannot be a mechanism for the Big Bang, as ZPE is tied to spacetime, which did not exist prior to the event. The conversation highlights the limitations of current scientific understanding, particularly regarding conditions before 10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, known as the Planck wall. The nature of energy in the vacuum of space and its potential contribution to the universe's creation remains speculative. Overall, the topic underscores the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the universe's origin.
RAD4921
Messages
346
Reaction score
1
In the beginning I have heard that the big bang came from an exploded singularity. What was this some sort of vacuum fluctuation? What are the current models of where the universe came from? Can something (the universe) be created from nothing or is it theory that energy resides in the vacuum of space? I have heard of zero-point energy. Does this type of energy reside hidden in the vacuum and does zero-point energy supposed to have played a role in the creation of the universe, as we know it?
Thanks RAD
 
Space news on Phys.org
There aren't many good answers to your questions, but I can elliminate one idea for you. 0-Point Energy (ZPE) cannot be a mechanism for the Big Bang. ZPE is a property of the vacuum of space; it is a property of spacetime. Since spacetime did not exist before the BB, none of its properties or mechanics can have contributed to the event.
 
LURCH said:
There aren't many good answers to your questions, but I can elliminate one idea for you. 0-Point Energy (ZPE) cannot be a mechanism for the Big Bang. ZPE is a property of the vacuum of space; it is a property of spacetime. Since spacetime did not exist before the BB, none of its properties or mechanics can have contributed to the event.
Thanks for your insight
RAD
 
Our science cannot penetrate the Planck wall - i.e., whatever may have existed before 10^-43 seconds after the big bang is pure speculation.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top