Is the Fractal Perimeter Infinite but Area Finite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Koch Snowflake, a well-known fractal that is said to have an infinite perimeter while enclosing a finite area. The initial argument suggests that since the perimeter increases by smaller amounts with each iteration, it might converge to a finite value, similar to certain converging series. However, it's clarified that the perimeter actually diverges because the number of segments increases, leading to a greater total perimeter despite the diminishing size of each added segment. The conversation also touches on the distinction between the perimeter and the area, emphasizing that the infinite perimeter does not exist "inside" the finite area. The conclusion acknowledges the extraordinary nature of this fractal's properties.
Gib Z
Homework Helper
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
7
Hey if you guys look up Fractal on Wikipedia, you see the author states that the Koch Snowflake, a common and famous fractal, supposedly has an infinite perimeter yet finite area. It sed it would be infinite perimeter because it keeps on adding perimeter with each iteration. How ever, i thought since it keeps on adding Less with each iteration, it would remsemble a series that continually adds less. i haven't worked out the actual series yet, i will soon, but basically since it keeps adding less and less, it should eventually converge into a finite number eventually, right? sort of like if u kept on adding 10^0 + 10^-1 + 10^-2 + 10^-3 + 10^-4 so on so forth, sure u keep adding numbers, but the first one is 1, 2nd term 0.1, 3rd 0.01, 4th in 0.001, so on in that fashion, adding to 1.11111111111111111111111..., or 1 and 1/9. well yea, so this fractal i think really had finite area
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not all series which have terms that go to zero converge. For example,

\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n} = \infty

To see this, note:

1+ \frac{1}{2} + \left(\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} \right) + \left(\frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{7} +\frac{1}{8} \right) + ... > 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \left( \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}\right) + \left( \frac{1}{8} +\frac{1}{8} +\frac{1}{8} +\frac{1}{8} \right) + ... = 1 + \frac{1}{2} +\frac{1}{2} + ... = \infty

But this doesn't matter here, because in the Koch snowflake, at each step you increase the perimeter by 4/3, so the terms in the series actually increase, and so it obviously diverges.
 
Last edited:
Gib Z said:
How ever, i thought since it keeps on adding Less with each iteration, it would remsemble a series that continually adds less.
It is true that each triangle part adds less per iteration but at the same time there are more of them per iteration. :smile:
 
yea that's for the help, i just realized wen i actually bothered to work it out this morning. wow that is quite extra ordinary, infinite perimeter inside a finite area. does anyone know the equations of any fractals, hopefully that i can plug into Graphamatica 2.0e?
 
Well, no, the perimeter is NOT "inside" the area!
 
excuse me? yes i think quite so. I was no referring to inside the finite area of the fractal, but say, a square around it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top