Calculating Height of Lift in Free Fall with Thrown Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter ritwik06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Lift
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a lift in free fall, a calculator is thrown upwards at 1 m/s from a height of 1 meter above the floor. It reaches the ceiling in two seconds, leading to a calculation of the lift's height as 3 meters. The discussion highlights that both the lift and the calculator are accelerating downward at the same rate, making the weight effectively zero within the lift. This means that the calculator's motion can be analyzed without considering gravity's effect on the lift. The key takeaway is that the lift's height is determined by the distance traveled by the calculator and its initial position.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A lift in free fall with Dr. Bhargav inside. In order to save his calculator he throws it up with 1 m/s from 1 meter above the floor of the lift. It reaches the sealing in two seconds. Calculate height of lift.



The Attempt at a Solution



As the wt in free fall=0.
Then distance traveled in 2 sec=2m
Total height =2+1=3m
:-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be my answer as well. Condolences to the Bhargav family.
 
The speed of the lift (and the passanger) changes as it falls downwards. This means that the speed of the calculator with respect to the lift will increase as time progresses.
 
andrevdh said:
The speed of the lift (and the passanger) changes as it falls downwards. This means that the speed of the calculator with respect to the lift will increase as time progresses.
Not with respect to the lift. Both lift and calculator are accelerating downward at the same rate. As long as you work withing the lift, you can ignore the acceleration due to gravity. That was ritwik06's point when he said "As the wt in free fall=0".
 
Well, for a while there I thought that the calculator stopped falling when it is throwed upwards (blame it on too much leave)!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top