Is the Hybridization of AsH3 sp3 or sp3d?

  • Thread starter Thread starter h20h
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hybridization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hybridization of AsH3, where the user is confused about counting lone pairs and bonding electrons. Arsenic (As) has five valence electrons and forms three bonds with hydrogen (H), leaving two electrons as a lone pair. This results in a total of four electron groups, leading to an sp3 hybridization, similar to ammonia (NH3). The user mistakenly considered the hybridization to be sp3d, which is incorrect in this context. The clarification emphasizes that lone pairs count as one group in determining hybridization.
h20h
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
HI! I have a quick question...we were asked on a quiz to draw the lewis dot structure for AsH3. Then describe the bonding scheme for the molecule in terms of hybridization.

I wrote that since As is in group 5...it has 5 electrons with 3 H bonded to it. In lab we were told to count lone pairs as one, so wouldn't you need 2 lone pairs to get up to 5 electrons? Or do you count the individual electrons individually? That is where I am confused...becuase if you count the lone pair as one group you would need another lone pair to get to 5? She gave us an answer for the hybridization of sp3 where I said sp3d...can you explain please?

Thanks
h20h
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The As has 5 binding electrons, and uses 3 to form covalent bounds with H. The other 2 form a lone pair. The situation is identical with ammonia NH_{3}. The hybridization for ammonia is sp_{3}. The same goes for water H_{2}O, but for the latter, there are 2 lone pairs from the 6 valence electrons of O.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top