Calculating Gravitational Potential Energy: A to B

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational potential at point A on Earth's surface is calculated using the formula U = -GM/r, resulting in approximately -6.26 x 10^29 J/kg. For point B, located 1000 km above A, the gravitational potential is about -5.41 x 10^29 J/kg. The energy required for a 10 kg object to reach point B from A is calculated to be approximately -5.41 x 10^30 J. The distinction between gravitational potential and gravitational potential energy is emphasized, with potential being energy per unit mass. The calculations provided are verified as correct based on the formulas discussed.
natural
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Forces & Fields

(a) calculate the gravatational potential pf a point A on the surface of the Earth
(b) what is the gravatational potential of a point B, 1000km above A?
(c) How much energy is expended if an object of mass 10kg were to just reach point B from A?

I know the eq. for gravatational potential energy is U=-GMm/r ...but what do i use as my 2nd mass ? :confused: please help I am really lost :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a difference between gravitational potential and gravitational potential energy.

Gravitational potential is the potential energy per unit mass of an object due to its position in a gravitational field. The gravitational potential due to a point mass:

Eg = -GM/r, where M is the mass of the object responsible for the gravitational field, whereas

gravitational potential energy is given by

mEg = -GMm/r

Please refer to this page - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/gpot.html

and the following plates including - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/gpot.html#gpi .
 
Last edited:
Are my calculations correct? just want to make sure>
a) -6.67*10^11 * 5.98*10^24/6.37*10^6 = -6.26*10^29

b)-6.67*10^11 * 5.98*10^24/ 6.37*10^6+1000*10^3 = -5.41*10^29

C)-6.67*10^11*5.98*10^24*10/6.37*10^6+1000*10^3 = -5.41*10^30
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top