Is thermal conductivity additive for multiple layers of different materials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether thermal conductivity is additive for multiple layers of different materials. One participant suggests that the total thermal conductivity resembles the behavior of capacitors in series, implying it cannot exceed the lowest individual conductivity. Another participant counters this by comparing thermal conductivity to resistors, noting that conductivity is the inverse of resistance. They propose a formula for calculating total conductivity based on individual layer conductivities. The conversation highlights the complexity of modeling thermal conductivity in layered materials.
Xeract
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I think the answer is yes, but I just wanted to check.

If you have several sheets of different material, is the total thermal conductivity the sum of the individual thermal conductivities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're wrong. The conductivity of the laminate is more like the capacitance of capacitors in series. The total conductivity can't be more than the lowest value in the laminate.
 
I was modelling the conductivity on resistors instead of capacitors. Surely the higher the thermal conductivity the higher the "resistance" to heat flow so they should be modeled as resistors?

(I could be completely wrong on this)
 
You're right about the resistors. But conductivity is the inverse of resistance,
so the addition ( for equal thickness layers) looks like,

\frac{1}{C_{tot}} = \sum \frac{1}{C_i}

which reminds me of capacitors. I could also be wrong.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top