What are the eastern components of the Earth's magnetic field in this city?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magna1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
The Earth's magnetic field in this city points towards the north pole and downward, with a horizontal component of 12.5 x 10^-6 T and an angle of declination of 22.5 degrees east of north. The discussion explores the components of the magnetic field using a 3-D coordinate system, where the x-axis is perpendicular to the y-axis (horizontal towards the north) and z-axis (upward). It is concluded that the x-component of the magnetic field is zero, indicating no magnetic field in that direction. The angle of declination is clarified to be interpreted in a 2-D context, leading to a formula for calculating the components. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in understanding the magnetic field's orientation and components.
Magna1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The Earth's magnetic field in this city points towards the north pole and downwards into the ground. The horizontal portion of the Earth's magnetic field is 12.5^10*-6 T and its angle of declination is 22.5 degrees(the angle east of north) What are the eastern components of the Earth's magnetiv field in this city?
I have no idea what to do or where to even start guessing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you want to know the vertical component or what? If that is true, you could just use the cosinus or sinus of the angle (22 degrees).
 
Originally posted by Magna1
The Earth's magnetic field in this city points towards the north pole and downwards into the ground.
This basically suggests a 3-D coordinate system with y-axis horizontal towards the N-pole, z-axis straight up into the sky, and then the x-axis perpendicular to both of these. All three axes are then mutually perpendicular. Hint #1: Can you imagine in what direction is the x-axis?

In this coordinate system, the magnetic field vector is then:

B = ( Bx , By , Bz )
= ( 0 , Bnorth , -Bupward )

So, the x-component of the magnetic field is zero. In other words, the magnetic field in the x-direction is zero.

EDIT:
I misread the question. I need to change some things in my reply.





Originally posted by Magna1
... its angle of declination is 22.5 degrees(the angle east of north) ...
This seems to contradict the first sentence. I don't know what to tell you. Perhaps the "downward" should be interpreted as if you're in space and looking at the Earth from the orientation that the axis of rotation is verticle and the north pole is on top. I find this a terrible way to word the question, and you have my sympathy. Anyway, this would make the coordinate system 2-D instead of 3-D.

B = ( Bx , By )
= ( B sin(22.5o) , B cos(22.5o) )

Again, you should decide what you think is the x-direction.

I'm terrible sorry if I have confused you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top