Does Weight Change with Reference Frame? A Question Explored

lightarrow
Messages
1,966
Reaction score
64
Sorry for the trivial (and certainly already covered) question.
Does a body's weight change with the ref. frame? If I had a very long scale on which the body can move without friction, would I observe the scale to sign different values according if I am stationary with the scale or with the object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, yes. If you assume that the scale is in an accelerating rocketship (to provide the acceleration needed to impart weight) the reading on the scale (assumed to be oriented so the pans are perpendicular to the direction of acceleration) will increase by a factor of gamma = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

Note that if the scale isn't oriented perpendicular to the direction of acceleration, the problem becomes a lot more complex.
 
pervect said:
Basically, yes. If you assume that the scale is in an accelerating rocketship (to provide the acceleration needed to impart weight) the reading on the scale (assumed to be oriented so the pans are perpendicular to the direction of acceleration) will increase by a factor of gamma = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

Note that if the scale isn't oriented perpendicular to the direction of acceleration, the problem becomes a lot more complex.
First of all, thanks for the answer.
Can you explain how this is possible? Which is the meaning of "reading the body's weight on the scale" for any observer? Shouldn't it be independent of the fact the observer moves or not with respect to the body?
 
The scale has its own frame - the main point of interest is the force on the scale in its frame, but it is possible to define the notion of force relativistically for any observer.

Relativistically, this is most conveniently handled by the concept of a 4-force. If we assume our mass is pointlike (or at least very small), we can find the 4-force by multiplying the mass m of our weight by the 4-acceleration.

The 4-acceleration is just the rate of change of the 4-velocity with respect to proper time.

See for instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity#Force

Another way of saying this - the three-force is the rate of change of the momentum of the mass m with respect to coordinate time. The four-force is the rate of change of the energy-momentum 4-vector with respect to proper time. So the 4-force has one additional component (the rate of change of energy with respect to proper time), and is computed with respect to proper time rather than coordinate time.

The reason to use 4-forces rather than 3-forces is that they transform via the Lorentz transform. In fact, this is a property of any of the various 4-vectors that I've mentioned - all 4 vectors transform in an identical manner (that's their defining characteristic) - i.e. they transform via the Lorentz transform.
 
Thank you very much.
lightarrow
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top