Why Water Is a Good Solvent: Reasons & Explanations

  • Thread starter Thread starter oceanflavored
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility Water
AI Thread Summary
Water's effectiveness as a solvent is primarily due to its polar nature, which allows it to interact with various molecules. Strong hydrogen bonds form between water and certain elements like fluorine, oxygen, and nitrogen, enhancing its solvent capabilities. However, these bonds are not universally strong across all molecules and can be easily broken. Low compressibility at high temperatures does not contribute to water's solvent properties, making it the correct answer to the question posed. Understanding these principles clarifies why water is considered a good solvent.
oceanflavored
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
This is a question I got confused on while helping my son with his homework. I thought you guys might know:
Which of the following is NOT a reason why water is a good solvent:
A] it is a polar molecule
B] it forms strong bonds with other molecules
C] it has low compressibility at high temperatures

I know it can't be A, because that is one of the main reasons. And I know B is true because hydrogen bonding is a really strong force, but then i remembered that it only with fluorine, oxygen, and nitrogen, so I didn't know if it was with every molecule. And I thought bonding related more to surface tension, and such. I know C is true but I haven't read up on that too much, so I'm not exactly sure.

Would appreciate any feedback GREATLY.
thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think B is the correct answer. Well, water can form some kinds of bonding with other molecules, especially the hydrogen bond. But those bonds can never be strong bonds and they can easily be dissociated under appropriate conditions.
 
Question is which is NOT a reason. Correct answer is C.

Borek
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top