Pipes carrying litre/min from A to B - HELP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ruffian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of pipe diameter on the head required to pump a specific flow rate. A 150mm diameter pipe carrying 40 litres/min has a cross-sectional area approximately double that of two 100mm pipes. While both configurations can transport the same volume, the smaller diameter pipes create more resistance to flow. Consequently, a stronger pump is needed for the 100mm pipes due to increased pressure drop. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective fluid transport design.
Ruffian
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was unable to attend a class in which we learned this, so any explanation would be appreciated (working and answer would be appreciated).

If a pipe is of 150mm dia. is carrying 40 litres/min from a site and it is replaced by 2 100mm dia. pipes carrying the same volume, what difference does it make to the head required to pump it?


Thankyou.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The cross section of the 150mm pipe is approximately double the 100mm pipe. So the two cases are equivalent. But the smaller the pipe the more resistance to the liquid motion so the second case, the pump must be stronger for the pressure drop is somewhat higher.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top