Is the Reaction in Equilibrium Given Kc and Q Values?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining if a chemical reaction is at equilibrium by comparing the equilibrium constant (Kc) to the reaction quotient (Q). For the reaction 2 H2 + O2 → 2 H2O, Kc is given as 9.1 x 10^80, while the calculated Q is 1.64 x 10^79. Since Q is less than Kc, the reaction is predicted to proceed in the forward direction. However, the textbook claims Q should equal Kc, suggesting the reaction is at equilibrium. The participant expresses confidence in their calculation, leading to the conclusion that the textbook may contain an error.

what are you doing in the summerrr?

  • traveling

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • studying chemistry:my one and only love

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
oceanflavored
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether or not each of the following system is in equilibrium. If the system is not in equilibrium, predict whether it will proceed in the forward or reverse direction:
2 H2(g) + O2(g) ---> 2H2O(g)
and Kc (equilibrium constant) is 9.1 x 10^80
and the concentrations are H2: 3 x 10^-30 M...for O2: 2.2 x 10^-24...for 2H2O: 0.0180 M

Homework Equations


To compare a system to equilibrium, you have to compare K to Q. where Q is [products]^coeffecients / [reactants]^coeffecients
and if Q = K, the reaction is at equilibrium...if Q < K, the reaction will move in the forward direction...and if Q > K, the reaction will move in the reverse direction.

The Attempt at a Solution


so i solved it like this...
[0.0180]^2 / [3 x 10^-30]^2[2.2 x 10-24] and i got...1.64 x 10^79 for Q
and since Q < K i said the reaction would move in the forward direction

and here's where the problem comes in
the book says: that for Q i should get 9.1 x 10^80, meaning that Q would be equal to K and reaction would be in equilibrium.

please help me. am i inputing the things in my calculator wrong? or is the book wrong? thanks muchhh :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
come on guysssssss.
you can do this.
please.
&gracias.
 
Well, I'm no chemist, but I think your calculation for Q is correct. I can't see a mistake in it. Are you sure you copied everything correctly? Perhaps the book is wrong.
 
Thanks!

i'm positive i copied everything correctly.&i did it like 10 times.
so the book is probably wrong.
thanks so much hage657 :-p
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top