Group 2 Periodic Table Elements: Redox Properties & Eθ

AI Thread Summary
Eθ refers to the standard electrode potential, indicating the voltage direction in chemical cells for generating electricity. In Group 2 elements, the trend shows that as atomic size increases, the ability to lose electrons and thus the reducing power also increases. The standard electrode potential values are low for these elements, reflecting their strong reducing agent properties, and these values decrease down the group. Lithium and bromine serve as examples, with lithium having a significantly negative Eθ, favoring electron loss, while bromine has a positive Eθ, favoring electron gain. Understanding these trends helps predict the redox behavior of Group 2 elements in chemical reactions.
_Greg_
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Nowhere in my notes does it say what Eθ is and i can't find a definition of it on the internet :confused:

I'll give you the context:

For group 2 of the periodic table, state and explain the trends in the following for their elements:

(i) redox property, related to Eθ value
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that symbol refers to the standard electrode potential. Think of it as the direction of the voltage for an electric current set up using chemical cells to generate the electricity. You can predict some properties and general periodic trends from interpreting it.

For example, compare Lithium and Bromine:

Li+ + e- -----> Li Electrode Potential: -3.04 V

Br2 + 2e- -----> 2Br- Electrode Potential: +1.07

The relatively large negative electrical potential for lithium can be interpreted to mean that generally an electric current in a chemical cell will favor the left side of the equation which has Lithium giving up electrons to form a cation as opposed to staying as Lithium metal on the right side of the equation (the larger the number, the greater the tendency towards one direction or the other).

On the other hand, the sign of the electrode potential for Bromine gas is positive which means the right side of that chemical equation is favored over the left (Bromine would tend to accept electrons and form a negative ion as opposed to staying bromine liquid).

This should match your expectation from early chemistry that Lithium will tend to lose 1 electron in chemical reactions and become positively charged while bromine will gain an electron to become negatively charged (only now with standard electrode potentials you can measure and verify this tendency). That's not all you can get from these values...when you compare the electrode potetials down a column in a periodic table or across rows do you notice any trends showing up?
 
yea, i see they decrease down the group.

this is what i put as an answer to that question:

The elements in group 2 are all strong reducing agents. The larger the atoms, the easier it is to lose electrons and therefore the reducing power increases down group 2. The standard electrode potential is the value of an elements ability to be reduced. The greater this value, the easier they are to be reduced. Since the group 2 elements undergo oxidation (making them reducing agents), they have very low Eθ values which degrease down group 2.

does that sound about right?

thanks for the reply
 
It's not a theta, it's a zero with a line thru it. It denotes the electrode potential of something at standard conditions. (pressure, temperature etc.)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top