Gravitational Potential Energy question

AI Thread Summary
In a binary star system with two sun-like stars separated by 1.00×10^12 m, a comet approaches from rest. The conservation of energy principle is applied using the equation K_f + U_f = K_i + U_i, where U_f is not zero at the midpoint due to the gravitational influence of both stars. The potential energy is calculated as U_f = 2*(U with one star), leading to the conclusion that K_f equals the change in potential energy. The final speed of the comet at the midpoint is determined to be approximately 32,586 m/s. This analysis highlights the importance of considering both stars' gravitational effects when calculating the comet's speed.
neo982
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A binary star system has two stars, each with the same mass as our sun, separated by 1.00×10^12 m. A comet is very far away and essentially at rest. Slowly but surely, gravity pulls the comet toward the stars. Suppose the comet travels along a straight line that passes through the midpoint between the two stars.

What is the comet's speed at the midpoint?

The attempt at a solution

I know that this is supposed to use the K_f +U_f = K_i + U_i formula because energy is conserved. But the hard part to this problem is the reasoning behind it. I thing that the final potential energy (U_F) should be zero there fore giving me the eq. K_f = K_i + U_i...but then I start to wonder if the K_i should be zero also because it says the velocity is essentially at zero. When trying some of these ideas I end up with a radius (for the potential energy formula) -Gmm/r also I am not sure how to factor in the mass of both the planets and the radius between them, I initially thought that I should treat them as one big planet with total mass. I am close, but just need help with the conceptual part of this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neo982 said:
I think that the final potential energy (U_F) should be zero there fore giving me the eq.
Nopes, I don't think so
@ the midpoint it is r distance away from both stars

Therefore U_f = 2*(U with one star)

And using the formula GMm/r, you can find U_i (r is inf)

and K_f is just change in U


Edit: I think you are right for most of the part.. and in the end that should leave you with this equation:
K_f+U_f = 0
 
Last edited:
Thanks I got it.. K_f + U_f = 0 ..therefore v_f = sqrt([2*G(2*mass of planet)/r]) where radius is 1/2 of the value the question gives..which is the diameter...which is 32,586 m/s

Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top