Orbitals around the nucleus problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksssudhanva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Orbitals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses misconceptions about the behavior of electrons in the 1s orbital of a hydrogen atom. It clarifies that, contrary to some beliefs, electrons can approach the nucleus, as quantum mechanics shows the probability density for finding a 1s electron is highest at the nucleus. However, when considering the probability per unit radius, the likelihood of finding an electron near the nucleus decreases due to geometric factors. This counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics is emphasized, highlighting the distinction between probability per unit volume and probability per unit radius. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of interpreting quantum probabilities in atomic structure.
ksssudhanva
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Rsepected sir
Please read my doubts in the attachment and kindly answer it.
Thankyou.
 

Attachments

  • doubt1.gif
    doubt1.gif
    13.1 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
From your first question:

The electrons in the 1s orbital cannot go very near to the nucleus.

Why do you believe that? It is not true. If you are thinking of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model in which electrons travel in classical planet-like circular or elliptical orbits, that model has not been considered valid for about eighty years now. It was superseded by the quantum mechanics of Schrödinger, Heisenberg, et al.

The probability per unit volume for finding a 1s electron (in a hydrogen atom) at a given location is given by the square of the wave function \psi for n = 1, as given near the bottom of this page:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydwf.html

Notice that this function has its maximum value at r = 0!
 
It depends on which probability you're talking about. The probability per unit of volume is given by |\psi|^2 which for the 1s orbital is maximum at r = 0, but the probability per unit of radius goes like r^2|\psi|^2 which goes to zero as r goes to zero.

If a particle is equally likely to be found anywhere within the volume of a sphere (uniform |\psi|^2), it is less likely to have a small r than a large r, because (loosely speaking) there are fewer points with small r than with large r. I consider this variation to be purely a geometrical artifact.
 
Yes, that is very counterintuitive. When I read 'probability per unit volume' I immediately think it is the probability of finding a certain electron within a volume element (thin shell) centered on the nucleus and a function of r and r + dr and, of course, that probability is per unit of radius and has a maximum value at r=a_0.
 
ignore this one.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top