Quantum Dots & Wells: Overview & Explanation

Adam
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Hello all, question time.

Could someone please tell me about quantum dots and wells? Basics, details, maths, whatever you've got.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum dots are the perfect testbench for testing the laws of quantum mechanics. Because they are essentially engineered quantum wells, they have the properties of artificial atoms.

There are many applications for quantum dots. A few of the more popular applications include: single electron transistors, lasers, and fluorescent bio-labels.

If you want to look at some rough equations which govern the behavior of quantum dots, just open an elementary textbook on quantum mechanics and look at some of the basic well structures... like the classic one-dimensional finite well or the classic square-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator potential. It just depends on how good of an approximation you want.

eNtRopY
 


Quantum dots and wells are structures that are used in nanotechnology and quantum computing. They are tiny semiconductor particles or wells that are just a few nanometers in size. These structures have unique properties due to the quantum confinement effect, which is the phenomenon where the movement of electrons and other particles is restricted due to their small size.

Quantum dots are typically made of materials such as silicon, germanium, or gallium arsenide and are often referred to as artificial atoms. They have a spherical shape and can contain a small number of electrons, ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand. The electrons in quantum dots are confined in all three dimensions, resulting in discrete energy levels, similar to those found in real atoms.

On the other hand, quantum wells are thin layers of semiconductors that are sandwiched between two layers of a different material. These layers have a thickness of only a few nanometers, and the electrons are confined in only two dimensions. This results in a two-dimensional electron gas with discrete energy levels.

One of the most significant advantages of quantum dots and wells is their tunability. By changing the size, shape, or composition of these structures, their electronic and optical properties can be controlled. This makes them ideal for applications such as quantum computing, where precise control of individual particles is necessary.

In terms of the mathematics involved, quantum dots and wells are described by quantum mechanics, which is a branch of physics that deals with the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level. The properties of these structures can be calculated using equations such as the Schrödinger equation, which describes the behavior of quantum particles.

In conclusion, quantum dots and wells are tiny structures with unique properties that are essential for various applications in nanotechnology and quantum computing. Their tunability and precise control of individual particles make them a promising area of research for future technological advancements.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top