Kinematic Equations: Can They be Used with 0 Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
Kinematic equations can be used with zero acceleration since zero is considered a constant. When acceleration is zero, the equations simplify to reflect constant velocity, meaning the object can still be in motion. For example, the equation xf = xi + v*xi*t holds true, as the acceleration term drops out. However, the equation vxf^2 = vxi^2 + 2ax(xf-xi) becomes vxf^2 = vxi^2, indicating that the final and initial velocities are the same if there is no acceleration. Understanding that zero acceleration implies constant velocity clarifies the application of these equations.
~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
Can they be used if the acceleration is = to zero??

I know that they can only be used if the acceleration is constant but is zero considered a constant??


Thanks =):confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? Try it and see what happens.
 
What do you mean try it?? I don't have a particular question...if I plug it into...

xf= xi + V*xi*t +(1/2)*ax*t^2 I get
if a=0

xf= xi +v*xi*t+ 0

Does this mean it is okay? I'm not sure what it would mean to say it "can be used".
 
Well, does the equation make sense when you made a=0?
 
:cry: I don't know...seriously..if it is okay or doesn't make sense...

is it yes?
reasoning: it is for the position as a function of time but even though you cancel out the t^2 with the zero there is still another t in the equation but this wouldn't make sense for the other kinematic equation:

vxf^2= vxi^2 +2ax(xf-xi)

since if you put in 0 for the ax then the only thing left is vxf^2= vxi^2
I'm not sure if that would make sense...but if it had 0 acceleration the object could still be moving so I dont' think the initial position would be the same as the final in all cases.

Help...
 
I don't know...*you're* going to tell me if it makes sense or not.

You are on the right track. Think some more and then post. I want you to develop the skill of thinking for yourself. (That means no one else post an answer for her, PLEASE ).
 
that response doesn't help at all, it doesn't give me any clue as to if my thoughts are correct or incorrect...all you tell me is to think...I did that before and posted what I thought...can't you give me a hint or something?

P.S telling me to think more isn't helping me...
 
I think cyrus is hoping that one would realize if acceleration, a = 0, then the problem is one of constant velocity.

Acceleration is the change in velocity as a function of time.
 
Thank you...Astronuc
That helped a lot ..now I can keep it in mind that it does make sense.
 
Back
Top