Why Does a Falling Particle Take 9/11 of Total Time to Cover Half the Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PiratePhysicist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A particle falling from a great height takes approximately 9/11 of the total time to cover the first half of the distance due to gravitational acceleration. The discussion involves deriving the equations of motion using Newton's law of gravitation and integrating to find velocity as a function of distance. The calculations reveal complexities, particularly when dealing with limits that lead to infinity. Clarifications on the application of the chain rule in the context of acceleration and velocity are also addressed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to solve the problem.
PiratePhysicist
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
1. Problem: A particle falls to Earth starting from rest at a great height (may times Earth's radius ). Neglect air resistance and show that the particle requires approximately 9/11 of the total time of fall to traverse the first half of the distance.

Homework Equations


F=\frac{-G M_e m}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


F=\frac{-G M_e m}{r^2}
a=\frac{-G M_e}{r^2}
\frac{\partial v}{\partial r} v = \frac{-G M_e}{r^2}
seperate and integrate
<br /> \frac{1}{2}v^2=\frac{G M_e}{r}+K
v^2 = \frac{2G M_e}{r}+K
v^2(r_0)=\frac{2G M_e}{r_0}+K=0
v^2=2G M_e \( \frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{r_0}\)
Then take square root, replace v with the time derivative of r, separate and integrate and you get this mess:
\int{\sqrt{\frac{r_0 r}{r_0-r}}\partial r}=\sqrt{G M_e}t
Which comes out to having a tangent in it, and in general very messy. Also when you plug the two values r_0 and 0, you wind up with an infinity. So any ideas where I went wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure a=(dv/dt)v?
 
It's not a = (dv/dt)v, it's a=(dv/dr)v
a = \frac{\partial v}{\partial r}*\frac{\partial r}{\partial t} = \frac{dv}{dt}
Chain rule!
 
Okay, sorry. Couldn't make out the r on this old computer monitor.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top