Can Mechanical Energy Be Conserved?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of mechanical energy in a system involving two masses, A and B, suspended from identical springs. Mass A has twice the mass of B, leading to a deflection relationship where the deflection of A is twice that of B. The mechanical potential energy equations derived are E_A = 4E_B for Mass A and E_B = -1/2 k(x)^2 for Mass B, indicating that the energy relationship holds true despite initial confusion regarding the signs in the equations. The participants clarify the setup and confirm the calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding the spring force and potential energy equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants (F = kx)
  • Knowledge of mechanical potential energy calculations
  • Familiarity with mass-spring systems and their dynamics
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation principles in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy in spring systems using calculus
  • Learn about the implications of mass ratios on spring deflection and energy
  • Explore advanced topics in mechanical energy conservation in dynamic systems
  • Investigate the effects of damping and external forces on spring-mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanical systems, particularly those studying energy conservation in mass-spring setups.

jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
I have no clue in solving this question, can somebody help me?
http://tinyurl.com/34ax9f
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what have you tried so far?...
 
One has two masses A and B, and the mass of A is twice that of B, i.e. mA = 2*mB.

They are suspended from identical springs and since the mass of A is twice that of B, the deflection of the spring suspending A must be twice that of the spring suspending mass B, because A is twice as heavy.

The force of the spring is F = kx where k is the spring constant and x is the deflection from rest when zero force is applied to the spring.

Now the spring mechanical potential energy is \int_0^x{F(s)}ds = 1/2 kx2, so if the deflection of A is 2x and the deflection of B is x, what can one say about the relationship between the mechanical energies?

Please refer to - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pespr.html
 
Last edited:
Hi, I think I am very confused the sign with total mechanical energy...can see here
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=196128

Hence using what I am understand
Treat downward as negative,
for Mass A
E=1/2k(2x)^2 - mg(-2x)
since mg=k(-x), so E=1/2k(2x)^2 - k(-x)(-2x)
E=6kx^2
for Mass B
E=1/2k(x)^2 - mg(-x)
=1/2k(x)^2 - k(-x)(-x)
=3/2kx^2
so E_A=4E_B

Correct...this is the answer...but this will contradict the answer at
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=196128
the answer is -1/2kx^2, not 3/2kx^2(cases for mass B)
What is the problem? I feel very confuse now:(
 
Hi, learningphysics has very kindly posted a long essay in the mentioned thread, will spend some time to digest it, hope that it will shed me some light for this question :)
 
Ok, I think the following make more sense after understanding the explanation of learningphysics

for Mass A
(1/2)k(2x)^2-mg(2x)
=2k(x)^2 - k(2x)(2x)
=-2k(x)^2
for Mass B
(1/2)k(x)^2-mg(x)
=1/2k(x)^2-k(x)^2
=-1/2k(x)^2

Hence E_A=4E_B

Is it?
 
Last edited:
By the way, what I understand from the question is:
Two blocks are hung by two springs separately, ie each block is hung by one spring, not sure is it correct...although the answer is correct.
 
jack1234 said:
Ok, I think the following make more sense after understanding the explanation of learningphysics

for Mass A
(1/2)k(2x)^2-mg(2x)
=2k(x)^2 - k(2x)(2x)
=-2k(x)^2
for Mass B
(1/2)k(x)^2-mg(x)
=1/2k(x)^2-k(x)^2
=-1/2k(x)^2

Hence E_A=4E_B

Is it?

yes, looks perfect to me.
 
jack1234 said:
By the way, what I understand from the question is:
Two blocks are hung by two springs separately, ie each block is hung by one spring, not sure is it correct...although the answer is correct.

yes, each is balanced by one spring separately...

only difference from what you said is that the masses are on top of springs that are being compressed... but that makes no difference mathematically...
 
  • #10
I see, thanks for the confirmation and correction :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K