Can Mechanical Energy Be Conserved?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of mechanical energy in a system involving two masses suspended from springs. The original poster seeks assistance in understanding the relationship between the mechanical energies of the two masses, given that one mass is twice the weight of the other.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the deflection of springs and the mechanical potential energy associated with each mass. They question the signs used in energy calculations and the implications of their results.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and clarifications regarding the calculations of mechanical energy for each mass. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of their findings, with some participants expressing confusion about the results and seeking further understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the signs in the energy equations and the interpretation of the setup, specifically whether each mass is suspended by its own spring or if there are other configurations involved. Participants reference external threads for additional context and clarification.

jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
I have no clue in solving this question, can somebody help me?
http://tinyurl.com/34ax9f
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what have you tried so far?...
 
One has two masses A and B, and the mass of A is twice that of B, i.e. mA = 2*mB.

They are suspended from identical springs and since the mass of A is twice that of B, the deflection of the spring suspending A must be twice that of the spring suspending mass B, because A is twice as heavy.

The force of the spring is F = kx where k is the spring constant and x is the deflection from rest when zero force is applied to the spring.

Now the spring mechanical potential energy is [itex]\int_0^x{F(s)}ds[/itex] = 1/2 kx2, so if the deflection of A is 2x and the deflection of B is x, what can one say about the relationship between the mechanical energies?

Please refer to - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pespr.html
 
Last edited:
Hi, I think I am very confused the sign with total mechanical energy...can see here
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=196128

Hence using what I am understand
Treat downward as negative,
for Mass A
E=1/2k(2x)^2 - mg(-2x)
since mg=k(-x), so E=1/2k(2x)^2 - k(-x)(-2x)
E=6kx^2
for Mass B
E=1/2k(x)^2 - mg(-x)
=1/2k(x)^2 - k(-x)(-x)
=3/2kx^2
so E_A=4E_B

Correct...this is the answer...but this will contradict the answer at
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=196128
the answer is -1/2kx^2, not 3/2kx^2(cases for mass B)
What is the problem? I feel very confuse now:(
 
Hi, learningphysics has very kindly posted a long essay in the mentioned thread, will spend some time to digest it, hope that it will shed me some light for this question :)
 
Ok, I think the following make more sense after understanding the explanation of learningphysics

for Mass A
(1/2)k(2x)^2-mg(2x)
=2k(x)^2 - k(2x)(2x)
=-2k(x)^2
for Mass B
(1/2)k(x)^2-mg(x)
=1/2k(x)^2-k(x)^2
=-1/2k(x)^2

Hence E_A=4E_B

Is it?
 
Last edited:
By the way, what I understand from the question is:
Two blocks are hung by two springs separately, ie each block is hung by one spring, not sure is it correct...although the answer is correct.
 
jack1234 said:
Ok, I think the following make more sense after understanding the explanation of learningphysics

for Mass A
(1/2)k(2x)^2-mg(2x)
=2k(x)^2 - k(2x)(2x)
=-2k(x)^2
for Mass B
(1/2)k(x)^2-mg(x)
=1/2k(x)^2-k(x)^2
=-1/2k(x)^2

Hence E_A=4E_B

Is it?

yes, looks perfect to me.
 
jack1234 said:
By the way, what I understand from the question is:
Two blocks are hung by two springs separately, ie each block is hung by one spring, not sure is it correct...although the answer is correct.

yes, each is balanced by one spring separately...

only difference from what you said is that the masses are on top of springs that are being compressed... but that makes no difference mathematically...
 
  • #10
I see, thanks for the confirmation and correction :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K