Trouble calculating the equilibrium of this object

  • Thread starter Thread starter kjthesandman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the equilibrium of a carpenter's square involves breaking the shape into two rectangles to find the center of gravity. The user initially considered using the scalar cross product but was advised to sum moment areas about each axis instead. The method involves using the formula for centroids, where the distances from the centroids to the origin are crucial. Specific values for x1, y1, x2, and y2 were provided, emphasizing the need to accurately determine these distances for each rectangle. Properly applying the area and centroid calculations will lead to the correct answer for the center of gravity.
kjthesandman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was having trouble calculating the equilibrium of this object. I thought I had to solve it using the scalar cross product...but I'm not certain I am on the right track. Can some one help me? This is the question.

A carpenter's square has the shape of an L, where d1 = 19.0 cm, d2 = 6.00 cm, d3 = 6.00 cm, d4 = 11.0 cm. Locate its center of gravity. (Hint: Take (x, y) = (0, 0) at the intersection of d1 and d4)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sort of, actually d3 is connected to d1, and d1 is the longer side of the carpenter square. The picture looks more like this...



p12-07alt.gif
 

Attachments

  • p12-07alt.gif
    p12-07alt.gif
    5.3 KB · Views: 436
Last edited:
Rather than using cross products, break up the shape into 2 rectangles, and sum moment areas about each axis separately , where the moment of an area is the area times the perpendicular distance from its centroid to the axis, and where
(A1)x1 + A2(x2) = (A1 + A2)(X_), etc., (which you are familiar with?).
 
Well I was using the equation ((m1)(x1)+(m2)(x2))/(m1+m2)= but i keep getting the wrong answer...using this method how do i find y1, y2, and x1, x2. I know it seems like a real fundamental question but I am still having trouble.
 
kjthesandman said:
Well I was using the equation ((m1)(x1)+(m2)(x2))/(m1+m2)= but i keep getting the wrong answer...using this method how do i find y1, y2, and x1, x2. I know it seems like a real fundamental question but I am still having trouble.
x1, x2, y1, and y2, are the perpendicular distances from the centroids of each area to the origin. For example, one of the rectangles is 19 by 6. For that particular rectangle, since its centroid is at its geometric center, then x1 is 3 and y1 is 9.5. Now find the centroid of the second rectangle, and the corresponding x2 and y2 distances. Be sure to use A1 and A2 for what you are calling m1 and m2.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top