Hanging Cable (Projectile Motion?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the length of a hanging cable over time, initially at rest, with a focus on projectile motion principles. The user initially attempted to derive the length using a basic kinematic equation but was confused by the book's solution involving hyperbolic functions. Clarification was sought regarding the force acting on the cable, specifically why the total mass is considered rather than just the hanging portion. The resolution involved understanding that the entire mass of the cable contributes to the acceleration due to gravity. Ultimately, the user grasped the solution and the reasoning behind the mass calculations.
TopCat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
(Solved) Hanging Cable (Projectile Motion?)

Homework Statement


A perfectly flexible cable has length L. Initially, the cable is at rest, with a length x_0 of it hanging vertically over the edge of a table. Neglecting friction, compute the length hanging over the edge after a time t. Assume that the sections of the cable remain straight during the motion.


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that I could take a reference point, that being the very tip of the cable hanging over the edge. Since friction is neglected the only force on the cable is gravity. If I take the table edge to be x=0 then the position of the tip of the cable over the edge will also give the length of cable behind it hanging. So then it should simply be x = x_0 + \frac{1}{2}gt^2 but the book lists the answer as x = x_0 cosh (\sqrt\frac{g}{L} t). I have no idea where to even start. Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume the linear density, that is, mass per unit length is d. The weight of the hanging portion is dxg, which is moving the whole mass of the chain. The accn of the whole chain is the same at time t. So,

dxg = Md^x/dt^2. Now, solve.
 
Outstanding! Thanks for the help. I've gotten the solution though I have one last question.

When describing the force on the portion of cable on the table why is the mass M used d*L and not d*(L - x)?
 
I've never taken into account the force on the mass on the table separately, because the whole mass, the mass on the table and the hanging portion both, is moved with the same accn by the weight of the hanging portion only.

So, where you have to write mass*accn, it's the whole mass M=d*L.
 
Okay, thank you very much. It all makes sense now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top