Zinc Ferrite Nano-Particles: Centrifuge RPM Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaronse_r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifuge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of isolating zinc ferrite nanoparticles from solution using centrifugation. A participant seeks advice on the appropriate RPM settings for a centrifuge to achieve effective separation. It is emphasized that instead of focusing solely on RPM, determining the necessary gravitational force (g) for effective separation is crucial. Ultracentrifugation, which involves much higher g forces than standard centrifuges, is recommended for better results. The conversation also suggests that if only a standard centrifuge is available, achieving satisfactory separation may be difficult. Additionally, the possibility of using filtration combined with centrifugation for size separation is mentioned as a potential alternative method.
Aaronse_r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey, I've been reading on this site for a week of so now, and just wanted to say thanks for all your contributions. Very helpfull!

My question is, I am making zinc ferrite nano-particles and i was wondering at what RPM i should set the centrifuge to, so that the zinc ferrite comes out of solution. Is there anyway of calculating this or is it simply trial and error? I have tried putting it next to a magnet instead of centrifuge, but it is slow. Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
These particles would be colloidal in nature and would not be easy to isolate by centrifugation either. It can be done and is called ultracentrifugation. I think the 'ultra' in ultracentrifugation means to 'turn the knob to its fastest setting and wait awhile'.
 
Magnetic centrifuge maybe? I'm sure someone's invented it. :biggrin:
 
Aaronse_r said:
Hey, I've been reading on this site for a week of so now, and just wanted to say thanks for all your contributions. Very helpfull!

My question is, I am making zinc ferrite nano-particles and i was wondering at what RPM i should set the centrifuge to, so that the zinc ferrite comes out of solution. Is there anyway of calculating this or is it simply trial and error? I have tried putting it next to a magnet instead of centrifuge, but it is slow. Thanks!

More accurately, you should ask how many times g you need to set the centrifuge for, and then calculate the appropriate RPM for the rotor in your model (if you still have the instruction manual, often you don't even have to break out a pencil and calculator, just look for the conversion table :biggrin:).

Ultracentrifugation does NOT mean just set the centrifuge on its highest setting. It means use an ultracentrifuge that reaches MUCH higher g forces than a standard laboratory centrifuge (50,000 or 75,000 x g upward to about 1,000,000 x g).

If you need an ultracentrifuge and only have a standard laboratory centrifuge, you're unlikely to get any reasonable separation.

Can you run your sample through a filter (with centrifugation if necessary) to do a size separation? I don't know what else is in your solution to have a clue if this is feasible (and still might not have a clue if I did know).
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top