How Do You Calculate the Electric Field in a Finite Charged Plate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rib5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Field
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field in a finite charged plate, it's important to recognize that the electric field inside a conductor is zero. The charge distribution on the surfaces of the conductor creates an electric field in the surrounding space, which can be analyzed using Gauss's law. Although the problem provides the dimensions of the plates, the assumption of infinite plates is valid due to their proximity, allowing for a uniform field approximation. The electric field outside the plates can be determined using the charge density formula. The discussion concludes with the successful application of Gauss's law to solve the problem.
Rib5
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is an electrical field causing a charge distribution of +Q and -Q on a thin square sheet of conductor with area A. Find the field


The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering how you can find the electric field if you don't know the thickness of the thin metal sheet? I thought about using Gauss's law but I don't know over what surface you could find a constant E.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the charges are uniformly distributed over the surfaces of the conductor. (What's the field from a sheet of charge?) What field would such a charge distribution create in the space between them? What must be the actual field within the conductor? So what additional field must be present?
 
Wouldn't the field inside the sheet be 0 since it is a conductor?
 
Rib5 said:
Wouldn't the field inside the sheet be 0 since it is a conductor?
Right. The total field within the conducting sheet will be zero. What's the contribution from the surface charges?
 
Alright I see where this is going. The field from the "two" plates creates a field equal and opposite to the electric field that is on the outside.

The thing that had me confused was that in the problem they give you the size of the plates (15cm), so I thought you can't assume they are infinite plates. But now I realize they just tell you that so you can get charge density.

Is the reason you can assume that the plates are infinite in size that they are so close together that any charge you put between would be so close to the plate compared to the size of the plate?

[[Edit]]

I solved the problem at least I'm pretty sure. I did it using the fact that the field away from an infinite plane is density/(2*Enot)

The other way I did it was using Gauss's Law and putting a box through the plane.Thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top