Units of Computing Power: How Much for a 1cm^3 Cube?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of computing power in relation to physical systems, specifically questioning how much computing power is needed to simulate a 1cm^3 cube of hot gas at the atomic level. It references information theory and thermodynamics, suggesting that thermodynamic entropy is linked to information entropy, which impacts the limits of computational representation and manipulation of information. The conversation highlights that simulating complex systems requires significant computational resources, emphasizing the relationship between energy and information processing. A recommended reading, "Decoding the Universe," discusses these themes but does not provide specific equations for the original query. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the theoretical limits of computation in physical contexts.
aquaregia
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I often hear about how solving some problem would require a computer "the size of the known universe", or something like that. Is there a "unit" of computing power?

How many units of this power would say a 1cm^3 cube of hot gas have? In other words assuming you wanted to simulate the actual atoms bouncing around, how many units would it take to simulate this perfectly?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
aquaregia said:
I often hear about how solving some problem would require a computer "the size of the known universe", or something like that. Is there a "unit" of computing power?

How many units of this power would say a 1cm^3 cube of hot gas have? In other words assuming you wanted to simulate the actual atoms bouncing around, how many units would it take to simulate this perfectly?


I believe information theory deals with these theoretical limitations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy

From that article you can see there is a relationship between information processing and with the physical universe. Especially here:

"In fact, in the view of Jaynes (1957), thermodynamics should be seen as an application of Shannon's information theory: the thermodynamic entropy is interpreted as being an estimate of the amount of further Shannon information needed to define the detailed microscopic state of the system, that remains uncommunicated by a description solely in terms of the macroscopic variables of classical thermodynamics. For example, adding heat to a system increases its thermodynamic entropy because it increases the number of possible microscopic states that it could be in, thus making any complete state description longer. (See article: maximum entropy thermodynamics). Maxwell's demon can (hypothetically) reduce the thermodynamic entropy of a system by using information about the states of individual molecules; but, as Landauer (from 1961) and co-workers have shown, to function the demon himself must increase thermodynamic entropy in the process, by at least the amount of Shannon information he proposes to first acquire and store; and so the total entropy does not decrease (which resolves the paradox)."

I read a popular physics book, "decoding the universe" where the author is talking about how information and thermodynamic entropy are actually two forms of the same physical quantity, and that actually thermodynamic entropy is a special case of information entropy. It talks about the Turing Machine, and how it relates to thermodynamics. There is a definite limit on how the physical universe can represent and manipulate information, and it takes energy to do this.

I highly recommend reading this book if this topic interests you, although it won't give you detailed theory or equations to solve your particular question.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top