Calculating 'Push' Force to Maintain Constant Speed

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the "push" force needed to maintain a conducting rail's constant speed while inducing a current of 0.69 A in a magnetic field of 0.50 T, the correct approach involves using the formula for magnetic force on a current-carrying wire. The calculated force is F = (0.69 A)(0.34 m)(0.50 T), resulting in a force of 0.117 N. It's important to note that this force counteracts the magnetic force acting on the wire, which aligns with Lenz's law, indicating that an external force is necessary to maintain motion against the induced magnetic effects. The discussion clarifies that the magnitude of the force is what is required, not its direction. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar problems in electromagnetism.
Laurie01
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A conducting rail in contact with conducting wires, oriented perpendicular to both wires, is pushed with constant speed, causing an induced current of 0.69 A. B = 0.50 T and R (Resistor) = 2.0

Calculate the "push" force necessary to maintain the rail's constant speed.


Homework Equations



I assume I use F = q * v * b



The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think I am using the correct equation here because there is no charge on the conducting rail. I am thinking I need to use an equation that I am not yet familiar with. I went to the chapter in my book over induction and I can't find any equations dealing with a 'push' force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field, not the force on a single charge. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/forwir2.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ohhh! Duhh. Lol. Thanks so much! That helped.

So, F = (0.69A)(0.34m)(.50T) = .117 N

And this would be considered the "push" force? Or would it be negative since the force is acting in the opposite direction?
 
Laurie01 said:
And this would be considered the "push" force? Or would it be negative since the force is acting in the opposite direction?
I assume they just want the magnitude of the force.

The induced current leads to a magnetic force on the wire. If you don't push the wire with a force opposite to the magnetic force to cancel it out, the wire will slow down due to the magnetic force. (This is the point of Lenz's law: The induced current is not "free"--you must push on the wire to maintain it.)
 
Thank you! That makes sense.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top